Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20386735›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2010

Dynamics and control of diseases in networks with community structure.

Marcel Salathé, James H Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Infectious disease and group size: more than just a numbers game.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. On the friendship paradox and inversity: A network property with applications to privacy-sensitive network interventions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcel SalathéDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America. salathe@stanford.edu
James H Jones

Funding

POPULATION GENETICS THEORYR01GM028016 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MARCUS W · 1985 to 2010
$2.5M
Demographic Change and Dependent Social StructuresK01HD051494 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, JAMES HOLLAND · 2005 to 2009
$658k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD051494NICHD NIH HHS K01HD51494NIGMS NIH HHS GM28016NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of infectious diseases spread via direct person-to-person transmission (such as influenza, smallpox, HIV/AIDS, etc.) depends on the underlying host contact network. Human contact networks exhibit strong community structure. Understanding how such community structure affects epidemics may provide insights for preventing the spread of disease between communities by changing the structure of the contact network through pharmaceutical or non-pharmaceutical interventions. We use empirical and simulated networks to investigate the spread of disease in networks with community structure. We find that community structure has a major impact on disease dynamics, and we show that in networks with strong community structure, immunization interventions targeted at individuals bridging communities are more effective than those simply targeting highly connected individuals. Because the structure of relevant contact networks is generally not known, and vaccine supply is often limited, there is great need for efficient vaccination algorithms that do not require full knowledge of the network. We developed an algorithm that acts only on locally available network information and is able to quickly identify targets for successful immunization intervention. The algorithm generally outperforms existing algorithms when vaccine supply is limited, particularly in networks with strong community structure. Understanding the spread of infectious diseases and designing optimal control strategies is a major goal of public health. Social networks show marked patterns of community structure, and our results, based on empirical and simulated data, demonstrate that community structure strongly affects disease dynamics. These results have implications for the design of control strategies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsResidence CharacteristicsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualDisease OutbreaksDisease Transmission, InfectiousHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansIncidenceStochastic ProcessesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID20386735
PMCPMC2851561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.