Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20386727›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2010

Economic appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: a cost-utility analysis.

Beate Sander, Jeffrey C Kwong, Chris T Bauch, Andreas Maetzel, Allison McGeer, Janet M Raboud, Murray Krahn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Economic evaluation of vaccines in Canada: A systematic review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination strategies for older Canadian adults: A multi-model comparison.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025
    Article
  6. SARS-CoV-2, Tdap, and influenza vaccination during pregnancy from 2019 to 2022 in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  7. Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination strategies for older Canadian adults: a cost-utility analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [The universal influenza vaccination in children with Vaxigrip TetraJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Economic evaluations of vaccines in Canada: a scoping review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Beate SanderDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. bsander@uhnres.utoronto.ca
Jeffrey C Kwong
Chris T Bauch
Andreas Maetzel
Allison McGeer
Janet M Raboud
Murray Krahn
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAToronto Public Health · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn July 2000, the province of Ontario, Canada, initiated a universal influenza immunization program (UIIP) to provide free seasonal influenza vaccines for the entire population. This is the first large-scale program of its kind worldwide. The objective of this study was to conduct an economic appraisal of Ontario's UIIP compared to a targeted influenza immunization program (TIIP). METHODS AND

findingsA cost-utility analysis using Ontario health administrative data was performed. The study was informed by a companion ecological study comparing physician visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths between 1997 and 2004 in Ontario and nine other Canadian provinces offering targeted immunization programs. The relative change estimates from pre-2000 to post-2000 as observed in other provinces were applied to pre-UIIP Ontario event rates to calculate the expected number of events had Ontario continued to offer targeted immunization. Main outcome measures were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs in 2006 Canadian dollars, and incremental cost-utility ratios (incremental cost per QALY gained). Program and other costs were drawn from Ontario sources. Utility weights were obtained from the literature. The incremental cost of the program per QALY gained was calculated from the health care payer perspective. Ontario's UIIP costs approximately twice as much as a targeted program but reduces influenza cases by 61% and mortality by 28%, saving an estimated 1,134 QALYs per season overall. Reducing influenza cases decreases health care services cost by 52%. Most cost savings can be attributed to hospitalizations avoided. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is Can$10,797/QALY gained. Results are most sensitive to immunization cost and number of deaths averted.

conclusionsUniversal immunization against seasonal influenza was estimated to be an economically attractive intervention.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedOntarioYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20386727
PMCPMC2850382
OpenAlexW2108306388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.