Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20386699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

An odorant receptor from the southern house mosquito Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus sensitive to oviposition attractants.

Julien Pelletier, David T Hughes, Charles W Luetje, Walter S Leal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diverse roles of microbial indole compounds in eukaryotic systems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  12. Insects · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julien PelletierDepartment of Entomology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
David T Hughes
Charles W Luetje
Walter S Leal
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Binding Site Structure of Insect Odorant Receptors.R01DC011091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LUETJE, CHARLES WARD · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Ligand Recognition Among Mammalian Odorant ReceptorsR01DC008119 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LUETJE, CHARLES WARD · 2008 to 2010
$972k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC008119NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008119NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsect odorant receptors (ORs) are heteromers comprised of highly variable odorant-binding subunits associated with one conserved co-receptor. They are potential molecular targets for the development of novel mosquito attractants and repellents. ORs have been identified in the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, and in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. However, they are still unknown in the Southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, which transmits pathogens that cause human diseases throughout the world, including West Nile Virus in the United States. METHODOLOGY: We have employed a combination of bioinformatics, molecular cloning and electrophysiology approaches to identify and characterize the response profile of an OR in Cx. quinquefasciatus. First, we have unveiled a large multigenic family of one-hundred-fifty-eight putative ORs in this species, including a subgroup of conserved ORs in three mosquito species. Using the Xenopus oocytes expression system, we have determined the response profile of CquiOR2, an antennae-specific OR, which shares high identity with putative orthologs in Anopheles gambiae (AgamOR2) and Aedes aegypti (AaegOR2).

conclusionWe show that CquiOR2 is highly sensitive to indole, an oviposition attractant for Cx. quinquefasciatus. The response profile of CquiOR2 expressed in Xenopus oocytes resembles that of an olfactory receptor neuron housed in the antennal short blunt-tipped sensilla (A2) of Cx. quinquefasciatus, which are natural detectors for oviposition attractants. This first Culex OR de-orphanized is, therefore, a potential molecular target for screening oviposition attractants.

Indexed as

OvipositionAnimalsCloning, MolecularComputational BiologyCulexElectrophysiologyIndolesOocytesReceptors, OdorantXenopusindoleIndolesReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID20386699
PMCPMC2851645
OpenAlexW2011047279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.