Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20386311›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology2010

Assessing the impact of medication use on trends in major coronary risk factors in older British men: a cohort study.

Sarah L Hardoon, Peter H Whincup, S Goya Wannamethee, Lucy T Lennon, Simon Capewell, Richard W Morris

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah L HardoonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, Division of Population Health, UCL, London, UK. s.hardoon@ucl.ac.uk
Peter H Whincup
S Goya Wannamethee
Lucy T Lennon
Simon Capewell
Richard W Morris
University College London · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/04/003British Heart Foundation RG/08/013/25942Medical Research Council G0500920Medical Research Council G0501307Medical Research Council G0701739Medical Research Council G0701739(85531)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the role of medication in 20-year trends in blood pressure (BP) and blood lipids in older British men. METHODS AND

resultsBP and lipids were measured in 4231 men from a representative cohort at baseline (1978-1980, aged 40-59 years) and after 20 years (1998-2000). Cohort-wide age-adjusted 20-year mean changes were as follows: systolic BP -7.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -9.7 to -5.4); diastolic BP +3.3 mmHg (+2.2 to +4.5); non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol -0.4 mmol/l (-0.5 to -0.2); HDL-cholesterol +0.16 mmol/l (+0.13 to +0.19). Much (79%) of the systolic BP fall occurred only among 1561 men (37%) reporting the use of BP-lowering medication during the follow-up; systolic BP changed by -12.3 mmHg (-14.7 to -9.9) and -1.6 mmHg (-3.7 to +0.5) among medication users and men not using medication, respectively (P<0.001 for medication-time interaction). One-third of the non-HDL-cholesterol fall occurred only among 302 men (8%) reporting the use of lipid-regulating drugs; non-HDL-cholesterol changed by -1.8 mmol/l (-2.0 to -1.6) and -0.2 mmol/l (-0.4 to -0.1) among medication users and men not using medication, respectively (P<0.001 for interaction). The HDL-cholesterol increase was not associated with lipid-regulating drug use (P=0.15 for interaction).

conclusionDecreases in BP were largely confined to medication users and overall changes in non-HDL-cholesterol were modest, suggesting the need for greater efforts to reduce BP and cholesterol among the general population. HDL-cholesterol increased among all men, likely reflecting cohort-wide improvements in associated health behaviours.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsBiomarkersBlood PressureCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCohort StudiesCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug UtilizationDyslipidemiasHealth BehaviorHumansHypertensionHypolipidemic AgentsLinear ModelsAntihypertensive AgentsBiomarkersCholesterolCholesterol, HDLHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID20386311
PMCPMC3194092
OpenAlexW1976257074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.