ArticleCritical care medicine2010
Age-, sex-, and race-based differences among patients enrolled versus not enrolled in acute lung injury clinical trials.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020Trial
- Trial
- The Swiss cohort of elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (SWITCO65+): rationale and methodology.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2013Trial
- Improving representation in critical care research.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Racial and ethnic minority participants in clinical trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive care medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Historic Abuses, Present Disparities, and Systemic Racism: Threats to Surrogate Decision-making for Critical Care Research Enrollment.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021Article
- Aging Influences the Metabolic and Inflammatory Phenotype in an Experimental Mouse Model of Acute Lung Injury.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Pathways, Contributors, and Correlates of Functional Limitation Across Specialties: Workshop Summary.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2019Review
- The Contributing Risk of Tobacco Use for ARDS Development in Burn-Injured Adults With Inhalation Injury.Respiratory care · 2017Observational
- The role of functional, social, and mobility dynamics in facilitating older African Americans participation in clinical research.Open access journal of clinical trials · 2017Article
- Factors affecting patient participation in clinical trials in Ireland: A narrative review.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2016Article
- Trends in Consent for Clinical Trials in Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Review
- Prevalence and impact of active and passive cigarette smoking in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Critical care medicine · 2014Article
- Healthcare disparities in critical illness.Critical care medicine · 2013Review
- Research participants' opinions of delayed consent for a randomised controlled trial of glucose control in intensive care.Intensive care medicine · 2013Article
- Randomized trials in emergency medicine journals, 2008 to 2011.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2013Article
- Health-care system distrust in the intensive care unit.Journal of critical care · 2012Article
- Short-term mortality prediction for acute lung injury patients: external validation of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network prediction model.Critical care medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLittle is known about the participation of racial/ethnic minorities, women, and the elderly into critical care clinical trials. We sought to characterize the representation of racial and ethnic minorities, women, and older patients in clinical trials of patients with acute lung injury and to determine the reasons for nonenrollment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of pooled screening logs from 44 academic hospitals participating in three multicentered, randomized, controlled trials conducted by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network from 1996 to 2005.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe calculated odds ratios of enrollment for age, sex, racial groups, and the odds ratio for the presence of each exclusion criterion by age, sex, and race adjusted for demographics, acute lung injury risk factor, study, and study center. A total of 10.4% of 17,459 screened patients with acute lung injury were enrolled. The median (range) enrollment by center was 15% (2% to 88%). Older patients of both sexes were less likely to be enrolled, but older women were more likely to be enrolled than older men. The adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for enrollment among men > or =75 yrs of age was 0.59 (0.45 to 0.77) and for women > or =75 yrs of age was 0.45 (0.32 to 0.62) compared with men <35 yrs of age. There were no differences in the likelihood of enrollment among all racial/ethnic groups. Older patients and men were less likely to be enrolled because of medical comorbidity. Among all patients who were not enrolled, black patients and their families refused participation more often than white patients.
conclusionsOlder patients are less likely to be enrolled in acute lung injury clinical trials. There is no evidence that women or racial/ethnic minorities are underrepresented in acute lung injury clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.