ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2010
Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.
Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03843957 (Effectiveness and Implementation of mPATH-CRC), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Implementation of mPATH-CRC: a Mobile Health System for Colorectal Cancer Screening
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with adolescent HPV vaccination in the U.S.: A systematic review of reviews and multilevel framework to inform intervention development.Preventive medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Primary Care Practitioner Perceptions on the Follow-up of Abnormal Cancer Screening Test Results.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Effect of Fee on Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance--ScreenFee, a Swedish Population-Based Randomised Trial.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Physicians, clinics, and neighborhoods: multiple levels of influence on colorectal cancer screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014Trial
- Systems intervention to promote colon cancer screening in safety net settings: protocol for a community-based participatory randomized controlled trial.Implementation science : IS · 2013Trial
- Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2012Trial
- Real-World Adherence and Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in a Regional Healthcare System.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Process Mapping to Compare and Improve Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Two US Healthcare Systems within the PROSPR Consortium.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Colorectal cancer screening blood test: awareness and willingness among a national sample of adults post-Federal and Drug Administration approval.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Health-care organization characteristics in cancer care delivery: an integrated conceptual framework with content validation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Modified Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Almaty, Kazakhstan.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and implementation of mPATH™-CRC: a mobile health system for colorectal cancer screening.Trials · 2023Article
- Organized Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Attendance and Determinants in Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Stakeholder engagement to initiate lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net health system.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2020Article
- Understanding primary care-oncology relationships within a changing healthcare environment.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Testing e-mail content to encourage physicians to access an audit and feedback tool: a factorial randomized experiment.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer screening is a process of care consisting of several steps and interfaces. This article reviews what is known about the association between organizational factors and cancer screening rates and examines how organizational strategies can address the steps and interfaces of cancer screening in the context of both intraorganizational and interorganizational processes. We reviewed 79 studies assessing the relationship between organizational factors and cancer screening. Screening rates are largely driven by strategies to 1) limit the number of interfaces across organizational boundaries; 2) recruit patients, promote referrals, and facilitate appointment scheduling; and 3) promote continuous patient care. Optimal screening rates can be achieved when health-care organizations tailor strategies to the steps and interfaces in the cancer screening process that are most critical for their organizations, the providers who work within them, and the patients they serve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.