Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20386048›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2010

Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care.

Stephen Hunt Taplin, Anne Brown Rodgers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness.Journal of oncology practice · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Physicians, clinics, and neighborhoods: multiple levels of influence on colorectal cancer screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting the Future by Studying the Past for Patients With Cancer Diagnosed in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen Hunt TaplinApplied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd, MSC 7344, EPN 4005, Rockville, MD 20852-7344, USA. taplins@mail.nih.gov
Anne Brown Rodgers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Patient Care ManagementQuality Assurance, Health CareCanadaCommunicationCooperative BehaviorHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterprofessional RelationsMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID20386048
PMCPMC3482951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.