Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20385855›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

In vivo comparison of the pharmacodynamic targets for echinocandin drugs against Candida species.

D Andes, D J Diekema, M A Pfaller, J Bohrmuller, K Marchillo, A Lepak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Antifungal pharmacodynamics: Latin America's perspective.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Low Caspofungin Exposure in Patients in Intensive Care Units.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia/invasive candidiasis in selected critically ill patients.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2012
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Activity of Rezafungin Against Echinocandin Non-wild typeOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Mini-Review of In Vitro Data forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D AndesDepartment of Medicine and Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792, USA. dra@medicine.wisc.edu
D J Diekema
M A Pfaller
J Bohrmuller
K Marchillo
A Lepak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous pharmacodynamic studies using in vivo candidiasis models have demonstrated that the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC is a good descriptor of the echinocandin exposure-response relationship. Further studies investigating the 24-h AUC/MIC target for a stasis endpoint identified free-drug 24-h AUC/MIC against Candida albicans and were similar for two echinocandins, anidulafungin and micafungin. The current studies expand investigation of a third echinocandin (caspofungin) and compare the pharmacodynamic target among C. albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis. Treatment studies were conducted with six C. albicans, nine C. glabrata, and 15 C. parapsilosis strains with various MICs (anidulafungin, 0.015 to 4.0 microg/ml; caspofungin, 0.03 to 4.0 microg/ml; and micafungin, 0.008 to 1.0 microg/ml). Efficacy was closely tied to MIC and the 24-h AUC/MIC. Therapy against C. parapsilosis required more of each echinocandin on a mg/kg basis. Caspofungin required less drug on a mg/kg basis for efficacy against all of the organisms than did the other two drugs. However, the 24-h AUC/MIC targets were similar among the echinocandins when free drug concentrations were considered, suggesting the relevance of protein binding. The targets for C. parapsilosis (mean, 7) and C. glabrata (mean, 7) were significantly lower than those for C. albicans (mean, 20) for each echinocandin. The results suggest that current susceptibility breakpoints and the consideration of organism species in these determinations should be reexplored.

Indexed as

AnidulafunginAnimalsAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandidiasisCaspofunginEchinocandinsFemaleKidneyLipopeptidesMicafunginMiceMice, Inbred ICRMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafungin

Identifiers

PMID20385855
PMCPMC2876357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.