Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20385854›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Population pharmacokinetics of doripenem based on data from phase 1 studies with healthy volunteers and phase 2 and 3 studies with critically ill patients.

Partha Nandy, Mahesh N Samtani, Rachel Lin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacodynamic variability beyond that explained by MICs.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Partha NandyClinical Pharmacology, Advanced PK/PD Modeling and Simulation, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ 08560, USA. PNandy@its.jnj.com
Mahesh N Samtani
Rachel Lin
Johnson & Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A population pharmacokinetic model of doripenem was constructed using data pooled from phase 1, 2, and 3 studies utilizing nonlinear mixed effects modeling. A 2-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination best described the log-transformed concentration-versus-time profile of doripenem. The model was parameterized in terms of total clearance (CL), central volume of distribution (V(c)), peripheral volume of distribution (V(p)), and distribution clearance between the central and peripheral compartments (Q). The final model was described by the following equations (for jth subject): CL(j) (liters/h) = 13.6.(CL(CR)(j)/98 ml/min)(0.659).(1 + CL(race)(j) [0 for Caucasian]); V(c)(j) (liters) = 11.6.(weight(j)/73 kg)(0.596); Q(j) (liters/h) = 4.74.(weight(j)/73)(1.06); and V(p)(j) (liters) = 6.04.(CL(CR)(j)/98 ml/min)(0.417).(weight(j)/73 kg)(0.840).(age(j)/40 years)(0.307). According to the final model, population mean parameter estimates and interindividual variability (percent coefficient of variation [% CV]) for CL (liters/h), V(c) (liters), V(p) (liters), and Q (liters/h) were 13.6 (19%), 11.6 (19%), 6.0 (25%), and 4.7 (42%), respectively. Residual variability, estimated using three separate additive residual error models, was 0.17 standard deviation (SD), 0.55 SD, and 0.92 SD for phase 1, 2, and 3 data, respectively. Creatinine clearance was the most significant predictor of doripenem clearance. Mean Bayesian clearance was approximately 33%, 55%, and 76% lower for individuals with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, respectively, than for those with normal renal function. The population pharmacokinetic model based on healthy volunteer data and patient data informs us of doripenem disposition in a more general population as well as of the important measurable intrinsic and extrinsic factors that significantly influence interindividual pharmacokinetic differences.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBayes TheoremCarbapenemsCreatinineCritical IllnessCross InfectionDoripenemFemaleHumansKidneyMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCreatinineDoripenem

Identifiers

PMID20385854
PMCPMC2876402
OpenAlexW2165099632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.