Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20385778›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2010

Continued primer synthesis at stalled replication forks contributes to checkpoint activation.

Christopher Van, Shan Yan, W Matthew Michael, Shou Waga, Karlene A Cimprich

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanisms of loading and release of the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher VanDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Shan Yan
W Matthew Michael
Shou Waga
Karlene A Cimprich
Harvard University · USStanford University · USJapan Women's University · JP

Funding

Regulation of the DNA Damage ResponseR01ES016486 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CIMPRICH, KARLENE A · 2007 to 2025
$6.2M
The role of Mus101 in maintenance of genome stabilityR01GM067735 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MICHAEL, MATTHEW · 2003 to 2012
$3.0M
Regulation of the DNA damage ResponseR56ES016486 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CIMPRICH, KARLENE A · 2024 to 2024
$500k
NIEHS NIH HHS ES016486NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016486NIEHS NIH HHS R56 ES016486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stalled replication forks activate and are stabilized by the ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related)-mediated checkpoint, but ultimately, they must also recover from the arrest. Although primed single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is sufficient for checkpoint activation, it is still unknown how this signal is generated at a stalled replication fork. Furthermore, it is not clear how recovery and fork restart occur in higher eukaryotes. Using Xenopus laevis egg extracts, we show that DNA replication continues at a stalled fork through the synthesis and elongation of new primers independent of the checkpoint. This synthesis is dependent on the activity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Pol-delta, and Pol-epsilon, and it contributes to the phosphorylation of Chk1. We also used defined DNA structures to show that for a fixed amount of ssDNA, increasing the number of primer-template junctions strongly enhances Chk1 phosphorylation. These results suggest that new primers are synthesized at stalled replication forks by the leading and lagging strand polymerases and that accumulation of these primers may contribute to checkpoint activation.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationAnimalsAphidicolinAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1ChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IDNA PrimersDNA, Single-StrandedEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleMaleProtein KinasesAphidicolinAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsAtr protein, XenopusCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Chek1 protein, XenopusChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IDNA PrimersDNA, Single-StrandedEnzyme InhibitorsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTopBP1 protein, XenopusXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20385778
PMCPMC2856894
OpenAlexW2141838695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.