Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20385209›Full record

ArticleBrain research bulletin2010

Striatal and white matter predictors of estimated diagnosis for Huntington disease.

Jane S Paulsen, Peggy C Nopoulos, Elizabeth Aylward, Christopher A Ross, Hans Johnson, Vincent A Magnotta, Andrew Juhl, Ronald K Pierson, James Mills, Douglas Langbehn and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research bulletin, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Sample enrichment for clinical trials to show delay of onset in huntington disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeting the cGAS-STING pathway mitigates Huntington disease pathogenesis in a knock-in mouse model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jane S PaulsenUniversity of Iowa Roy and Lucille Carver College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Iowa City, IA, United States. jane-paulsen@uiowa.edu
Peggy C Nopoulos
Elizabeth Aylward
Christopher A Ross
Hans Johnson
Vincent A Magnotta
Andrew Juhl
Ronald K Pierson
James Mills
Douglas Langbehn
Martha Nance
PREDICT-HD Investigators and Coordinators of the Huntington's Study Group (HSG)
University of Iowa · USJohns Hopkins University · USPark Nicollet Methodist Hospital · US

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF HUNTINGTON'S DISEASER01NS040068 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PAULSEN, JANE S · 2001 to 2013
$48.5M
University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science ProgramUL1TR000442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROSENTHAL, GARY E · 2012 to 2013
$10.0M
BRAINS Morphology and Image AnalysisR01NS050568 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MAGNOTTA, VINCENT A · 2007 to 2009
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000442NINDS NIH HHS NS40068NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040068NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous MRI studies with participants prior to manifest Huntington disease have been conducted in small single-site samples. The current study reports data from a systematic multi-national study during the prodromal period of Huntington disease and examines whether various brain structures make unique predictions about the proximity to manifest disease. MRI scans were acquired from 657 participants enrolled at 1 of 32 PREDICT-HD research sites. Only prodromal Huntington disease participants (those not meeting motor criteria for diagnosis) were included and subgrouped by estimated diagnosis proximity (Near, Mid, and Far) based upon a formula incorporating age and CAG-repeat length. Results show volumes of all three subgroups differed significantly from Controls for total brain tissue, cerebral spinal fluid, white matter, cortical gray matter, thalamus, caudate, and putamen. Total striatal volume demonstrated the largest differences between Controls and all three prodromal subgroups. Cerebral white matter offered additional independent power in the prediction of estimated proximity to diagnosis. In conclusion, this large cross-sectional study shows that changes in brain volume are detectable years to decades prior to estimated motor diagnosis of Huntington disease. This suggests that a clinical trial of a putative neuroprotective agent could begin as much as 15 years prior to estimated motor diagnosis in a cohort of persons at risk for but not meeting clinical motor diagnostic criteria for Huntington disease, and that neuroimaging (striatal and white matter volumes) may be among the best predictors of diagnosis proximity.

Indexed as

BrainAdultCorpus StriatumCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHuntington DiseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, AnatomicNerve Fibers, MyelinatedPhenotypePredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID20385209
PMCPMC2892238
OpenAlexW2021549489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.