Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20385026›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

A toolkit for rapid gene mapping in the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Daniel C Koboldt, Julia Staisch, Bavithra Thillainathan, Karen Haines, Scott E Baird, Helen M Chamberlin, Eric S Haag, Raymond D Miller, Bhagwati P Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A gap-free, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization of two newmicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel C KoboldtDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Julia Staisch
Bavithra Thillainathan
Karen Haines
Scott E Baird
Helen M Chamberlin
Eric S Haag
Raymond D Miller
Bhagwati P Gupta
McMaster University · CAWashington University in St. Louis · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USWright State University · US

Funding

Integrating Genetic and Genomic Resources for C BriggsaeR24GM075101 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, RAYMOND D · 2005 to 2006
$689k
NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM075101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nematode C. briggsae serves as a useful model organism for comparative analysis of developmental and behavioral processes. The amenability of C. briggsae to genetic manipulations and the availability of its genome sequence have prompted researchers to study evolutionary changes in gene function and signaling pathways. These studies rely on the availability of forward genetic tools such as mutants and mapping markers.

resultsWe have computationally identified more than 30,000 polymorphisms (SNPs and indels) in C. briggsae strains AF16 and HK104. These include 1,363 SNPs that change restriction enzyme recognition sites (snip-SNPs) and 638 indels that range between 7 bp and 2 kb. We established bulk segregant and single animal-based PCR assay conditions and used these to test 107 polymorphisms. A total of 75 polymorphisms, consisting of 14 snip-SNPs and 61 indels, were experimentally confirmed with an overall success rate of 83%. The utility of polymorphisms in genetic studies was demonstrated by successful mapping of 12 mutations, including 5 that were localized to sub-chromosomal regions. Our mapping experiments have also revealed one case of a misassembled contig on chromosome 3.

conclusionsWe report a comprehensive set of polymorphisms in C. briggsae wild-type strains and demonstrate their use in mapping mutations. We also show that molecular markers can be useful tools to improve the C. briggsae genome sequence assembly. Our polymorphism resource promises to accelerate genetic and functional studies of C. briggsae genes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditisChromosome MappingINDEL MutationPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID20385026
PMCPMC2864247
OpenAlexW2123004132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.