Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20384494›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2010

Nevirapine resistance by timing of HIV type 1 infection in infants treated with single-dose nevirapine.

Mark A Micek, Ana Judith Blanco, Ingrid A Beck, Sandra Dross, Laurinda Matunha, Pablo Montoya, Kristy Seidel, Soren Gantt, Eduardo Matediane, Lilia Jamisse and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark A MicekDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ana Judith Blanco
Ingrid A Beck
Sandra Dross
Laurinda Matunha
Pablo Montoya
Kristy Seidel
Soren Gantt
Eduardo Matediane
Lilia Jamisse
Stephen Gloyd
Lisa M Frenkel
University of Washington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USHealth Alliance International · USMinistry of Health · MZ

Funding

VENEREAL DISEASET32AI007140 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Julia Cook Dombrowski · 1985 to 2026
$19.4M
Institute for Translational Health Science (KL2)KL2RR025015 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$9.3M
Reservoirs of drug-resistant HIV-1R01AI058723 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI FRENKEL, LISA M · 2005 to 2009
$2.0M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025015NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058723NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007140NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI07140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn women, single-dose nevirapine for prophylaxis against mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) selects for nevirapine-resistant HIV-1, which subsequently decays rapidly. We hypothesized that the selection, acquisition, and decay of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 differs in infants, varying by the timing of HIV-1 infection.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, observational study of 740 Mozambican infants receiving single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis and determined the timing of infection and concentrations of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 over time.

resultsInfants with established in utero infection had a high rate (87.0%) of selection of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 mutants, which rapidly decayed to undetectable levels. The few without nevirapine resistance received zidovudine with single-dose nevirapine and/or their mothers took alternative antiretroviral drugs. Infants with acute in utero infection had a lower rate of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 (33.3%; P = .006, compared with established in utero infection), but mutants persisted over time. Infants with peripartum infection also had a lower rate of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 (38.1%; P = .001, compared with established in utero infection) but often acquired 100% mutant virus that persisted over time (P = .017, compared with established in utero infection).

conclusionsThe detection and persistence of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 in infants after single-dose nevirapine therapy vary by the timing of infection and the antiretroviral regimen. In infants with persistent high-level nevirapine-resistant HIV-1, nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy is unlikely to ever be efficacious because of concentrations in long-lived viral reservoirs. However, the absence or decay of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 in many infants suggests that nevirapine antiretroviral therapy may be effective if testing can identify these individuals.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralChemopreventionFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaleMozambiqueNevirapineProspective StudiesTime FactorsNevirapine

Identifiers

PMID20384494
PMCPMC3038662
OpenAlexW2164423496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.