Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20383743›Full record

ReviewAngiogenesis2010

Non-invasive imaging of angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Jacobus F A Jansen, Jason A Koutcher, Amita Shukla-Dave

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angiogenesis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of Head and Neck Tumors with Functional MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Nodal vascularity as an indicator of cervicofacial metastasis in oral cancer: A Doppler sonographic study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Imaging of angiogenesis.Angiogenesis · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacobus F A JansenDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Jason A Koutcher
Amita Shukla-Dave

Funding

MR Dynamic Imaging and Spectroscopy in Head & Neck CancersR01CA115895 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DAVE, AMITA · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 1 R01CA115895NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is the seventh most common cancer in the United States. Angiogenesis, the process by which new blood vessels are formed, is an essential element at the basis of both tumor growth and metastases. This review discusses pertinent aspects of the role of imaging modalities in assessing angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapy in advanced HNSCC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDiagnostic ImagingHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansNeovascularization, Pathologic

Identifiers

PMID20383743
PMCPMC2912423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.