Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20383534›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2010

Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.

Takashi Akiyoshi, Hiroya Kuroyanagi, Masatoshi Oya, Masashi Ueno, Yoshiya Fujimoto, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Toshiharu Yamaguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pancreatic injuries following laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takashi AkiyoshiGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Hiroya Kuroyanagi
Masatoshi Oya
Masashi Ueno
Yoshiya Fujimoto
Tsuyoshi Konishi
Toshiharu Yamaguchi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic colon resection for left-sided colon cancer is being performed with increasing frequency worldwide. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of patient- and procedure-related factors on difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.

methodsTwo hundred sixty consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer from July 2005 to December 2008. Gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor size, previous abdominal surgery, tumor depth, tumor stage, splenic flexure mobilization, type of anastomosis, and site of arterial division were analyzed as potential variables that affect difficulty of laparoscopic surgery. Dependent variables were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and proximal and distal tumor margin. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictive significance of variables.

resultsMultivariate analysis showed that male gender (P = 0.0183) and splenic flexure mobilization (P < 0.0001) were independently predictive of longer operative time. Splenic flexure mobilization was related to greater intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.0006), intraoperative complications (P = 0.0111, odds ratio: 7.22), and wider distal tumor margin (P = 0.0048).

conclusionsMale gender and splenic flexure mobilization were independent predictors of difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer. In contrast, our findings also showed that BMI, tumor location, previous abdominal surgery, tumor stage, type of anastomosis, and site of arterial division did not have an adverse impact on difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer in our clinical setting. Our data support the safety of performing laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer in well-selected patients by well-experienced surgical teams.

Indexed as

ColectomyLaparoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalColon, DescendingColonic NeoplasmsColon, SigmoidFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.