Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20382986›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2010

Radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography: what is it and why should we care?

Elspeth F Garman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 197 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Show me how it's done: introducing Protocols.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A fast X-ray shutter for high-power beams.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026
    Article
  10. Modernizing biomolecular NMR: The POKY suite.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A Bright and Dynamic Future in Structural Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Advanced synchrotron method reveals early molecular decomposition steps in a high-energy material.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elspeth F GarmanLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, England. elspeth.garman@bioch.ox.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation damage inflicted during diffraction data collection in macromolecular crystallography has re-emerged in the last decade as a major experimental and computational challenge, as even for crystals held at 100 K it can result in severe data-quality degradation and the appearance in solved structures of artefacts which affect biological interpretations. Here, the observable symptoms and basic physical processes involved in radiation damage are described and the concept of absorbed dose as the basic metric against which to monitor the experimentally observed changes is outlined. Investigations into radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography are ongoing and the number of studies is rapidly increasing. The current literature on the subject is compiled as a resource for the interested researcher.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, RadiationCrystallography, X-RayModels, MolecularProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryX-RaysProteins

Identifiers

PMID20382986
PMCPMC2852297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.