Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20382764›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2010

Direct regulation of Bacillus subtilis phoPR transcription by transition state regulator ScoC.

Bindiya Kaushal, Salbi Paul, F Marion Hulett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Two Distinct Regulatory Systems Control Pulcherrimin Biosynthesis inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Phosphate (Pi) Transporter PIT1 Induces Pi Starvation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bindiya KaushalLaboratory for Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 900 S. Ashland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Salbi Paul
F Marion Hulett
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

CLONING AND CHARACTERIZING B SUBTILIS APASE GENESR01GM033471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HULETT, F MARION · 1985 to 2009
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-33471NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of the Pho response in Bacillus subtilis occurs when the P(i) concentrations in the growth medium fall below 0.1 mM, a condition which results in slowed cellular growth followed by entry into stationary phase. The phoPR promoter region contains three sigma(A)-responsive promoters; only promoter P(A4) is PhoP autoregulated. Expression of the phoPR operon is postexponential, suggesting the possibility of a repressor role for a transition-state-regulatory protein(s). Expression of a phoPR promoter-lacZ fusion in a scoC loss-of-function mutant strain grown in low-phosphate defined medium was significantly higher than expression in the wild-type strain during exponential growth or stationary phase. Derepression in the scoC strain from a phoP promoter fusion containing a mutation in the CcpA binding site (cre1) was further elevated approximately 1.4-fold, indicating that the repressor effects of ScoC and CcpA on phoP expression were cumulative. DNase I footprinting showed protection of putative binding sites by ScoC, which included the -10 and/or -35 elements of five (P(B1), P(E2), P(A3), P(A4), and P(A6)) of the six promoters within the phoPR promoter region. P(A6) was expressed in vivo from the phoP cre1 promoter fusion in both wild-type and scoC strains. Evidence for ScoC repression in vivo was shown by primer extension for P(A4) and P(A3) from the wild-type promoter and for P(A4) and P(E2) from the phoP cre1 promoter. The latter may reflect ScoC repression of sporulation that indirectly affects phoPR transcription. ScoC was shown to repress P(A6), P(A4), P(E2), and P(B1) in vitro.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceDNA, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialScoC protein, Bacillus subtilisTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20382764
PMCPMC2901694
OpenAlexW2083384214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.