Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20382662›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2010

Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study.

David T Huang, Gilles Clermont, Lan Kong, Lisa A Weissfeld, J Bryan Sexton, Kathy M Rowan, Derek C Angus

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Interprofessional Team Staffing in U.S. Intensive Care Units.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A dimensional analysis of nursing unit culture.Journal of advanced nursing · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David T HuangCRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. huangdt@upmc.edu
Gilles Clermont
Lan Kong
Lisa A Weissfeld
J Bryan Sexton
Kathy M Rowan
Derek C Angus

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Critical Care Outcomes ResearchT32HL007820 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Timothy D Girard, Jeremy M Kahn · 1996 to 2026
$6.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 02-T32HL07820-06NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSafety culture may influence patient outcomes, but evidence is limited. We sought to determine if intensive care unit (ICU) safety culture is independently associated with outcomes.

designCohort study combining safety culture survey data with the Project IMPACT Critical Care Medicine (PICCM) clinical database.

settingThirty ICUs participating in the PICCM database.

participantsA total of 65 978 patients admitted January 2001-March 2005.

interventionsNone.

main outcome measuresHospital mortality and length of stay (LOS).

methodsFrom December 2003 to April 2004, we surveyed study ICUs using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire-ICU version, a validated instrument that assesses safety culture across six factors. We calculated factor mean and percent-positive scores (% respondents with mean score > or =75 on a 0-100 scale) for each ICU, and generated case-mix adjusted, patient-level, ICU-clustered regression analyses to determine the independent association of safety culture and outcome.

resultsWe achieved a 47.9% response (2103 of 4373 ICU personnel). Culture scores were mostly low to moderate and varied across ICUs (range: 13-88, percent-positive scores). After adjustment for patient, hospital and ICU characteristics, for every 10% decrease in ICU perceptions of management percent-positive score, the odds ratio for hospital mortality was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.07-1.44; P = 0.005). For every 10% decrease in ICU safety climate percent-positive score, LOS increased 15% (95% CI: 1-30%; P = 0.03). Sensitivity analyses for non-response bias consistently associated safety climate with outcome, but also yielded some counterintuitive results.

conclusionIn a multicenter study conducted in the USA, perceptions of management and safety climate were moderately associated with outcomes. Future work should further develop methods of assessing safety culture and association with outcomes.

Indexed as

Organizational CultureCohort StudiesHospital Bed CapacityHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayPerceptionPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20382662
PMCPMC2868527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.