Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20381319›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2010

The psychosis risk syndrome and its proposed inclusion in the DSM-V: a risk-benefit analysis.

Cheryl M Corcoran, Michael B First, Barbara Cornblatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Auditory event-related potentials and α oscillations in the psychosis prodrome: neuronal generator patterns during a novelty oddball task.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2014
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl M CorcoranDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute at Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA. Cc788@columbia.edu
Michael B First
Barbara Cornblatt
Columbia University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USNorthwell Health · US

Funding

Schizophrenia risk to onset: Neurobiology and preventionK23MH066279 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2004 to 2008
$884k
Olfaction in the Psychosis Prodrome: Behavioral and ERP MeasuresR21MH086125 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BRUDER, GERARD E, CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2009 to 2010
$440k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH066279NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH066279-01NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inclusion of a psychosis risk syndrome has been proposed for the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The appropriateness of inclusion of this new risk syndrome in the DSM depends on a careful analysis of both anticipated benefits and risks. Purported benefits include early recognition and case identification, and the hypothetical benefit of preventive intervention of psychotic disorders, for which there is as yet no clear evidence base. However, there is a potential for high rates of false positives particularly at the community level given the difficulty in discriminating mild symptoms from normal variants and low base rates of the syndrome in the general population. High false-positive rates in and of themselves are not necessarily problematic if the risk-benefit ratio is significantly favorable, as with screening for cardiovascular risk factors. For the psychosis risk syndrome, by contrast, there are substantial risks, for both stigma and discrimination, and for unnecessary exposure to antipsychotic medications, which make the high false-positive rate associated with the psychosis risk designation particularly problematic. More research is needed to improve the positive predictive value of the psychosis risk syndrome so that it can be considered for inclusion in future editions of the DSM.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAntipsychotic AgentsHumansMental DisordersPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID20381319
PMCPMC2923037
OpenAlexW2011194880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.