Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20380817›Full record

ReviewBrain research2010

Long non-coding RNAs in nervous system function and disease.

Irfan A Qureshi, John S Mattick, Mark F Mehler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 239 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed, 434 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Non-coding RNA research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dark DNA and stress (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Distinct gene expression patterns ofJournal of genetics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Irfan A QureshiRosyln and Leslie Goldstein Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1410 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
John S Mattick
Mark F Mehler
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Mechanisms Regulating Astroglial Lineage DevelopmentR01MH066290 · NIMH · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 2002 to 2006
$1.8M
REGULATION OF POSTNATAL CORTICAL MULTIPOTENT PROGENITORSR01NS038902 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 1999 to 2002
$886k
NIMH NIH HHS MH66290NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066290NINDS NIH HHS NS38902NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) development, homeostasis, stress responses, and plasticity are all mediated by epigenetic mechanisms that modulate gene expression and promote selective deployment of functional gene networks in response to complex profiles of interoceptive and environmental signals. Thus, not surprisingly, disruptions of these epigenetic processes are implicated in the pathogenesis of a spectrum of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Epigenetic mechanisms involve chromatin remodeling by relatively generic complexes that catalyze DNA methylation and various types of histone modifications. There is increasing evidence that these complexes are directed to their sites of action by long non-protein-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), of which there are tens if not hundreds of thousands specified in the genome. LncRNAs are transcribed in complex intergenic, overlapping and antisense patterns relative to adjacent protein-coding genes, suggesting that many lncRNAs regulate the expression of these genes. LncRNAs also participate in a wide array of subcellular processes, including the formation and function of cellular organelles. Most lncRNAs are transcribed in a developmentally regulated and cell type specific manner, particularly in the CNS, wherein over half of all lncRNAs are expressed. While the numerous biological functions of lncRNAs are yet to be characterized fully, a number of recent studies suggest that lnRNAs are important for mediating cell identity. This function seems to be especially important for generating the enormous array of regional neuronal and glial cell subtypes that are present in the CNS. Further studies have also begun to elucidate additional roles played by lncRNAs in CNS processes, including homeostasis, stress responses and plasticity. Herein, we review emerging evidence that highlights the expression and function of lncRNAs in the CNS and suggests that lncRNA deregulation is an important factor in various CNS pathologies including neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative and neuroimmunological disorders, primary brain tumors, and psychiatric diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain DiseasesHumansRNA, UntranslatedSpinal CordSpinal Cord DiseasesRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID20380817
PMCPMC2883659
OpenAlexW2069139855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.