ArticleBMC health services research2010
Four minutes for a patient, twenty seconds for a relative - an observational study at a university hospital.
Article in BMC health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Opportunities for Patients to Raise Concerns During Ward Rounds: A Quality Improvement Project.Cureus · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence in daily urological care: results of the AI barometer].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Large language models as a communication and organizational infrastructure in urology: evidence, limitations, and clinical responsibility].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Evaluation and perspectives of the OrphanAnesthesia project - a survey among anesthesiologists in Germany.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- [LLM-based extraction of clinical data: potentials and challenges].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Assessing Patient Satisfaction With the Discharge Process Through a Patient-Centered Lens.Cureus · 2025Article
- A framework to assess clinical safety and hallucination rates of LLMs for medical text summarisation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Surgery: A New Frontier in Patient Communication and Education.Gastroenterology research · 2025Review
- Synoptic reporting by summarizing cancer pathology reports using large language models.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Herpes zoster in older adults: Impact on carbon footprint in the United States.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Comparing Patient's Confidence in Clinical Capabilities in Urology: Large Language Models Versus Urologists.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Large language models: Are artificial intelligence-based chatbots a reliable source of patient information for spinal surgery?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- [Impact of legal documentation requirements on physician practice using a regional specialty hospital as an example: an inventory].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2024Article
- Large Language Models in Oncology: Revolution or Cause for Concern?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- The future landscape of large language models in medicine.Communications medicine · 2023Review
- Orthopedic Resident and Patient Perception of Electronic Medical Record Use During the Clinic Visit.Cureus · 2023Article
- A multicomponent complex intervention for supportive follow-up of persons with chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled pilot study (the UTILE project).Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- A Qualitative Exploration to Understand Hospitalists' Attitude Toward the Patient Experience Scoring System.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Is it time to rethink how we page physicians? Understanding paging patterns in a tertiary care hospital.BMC health services research · 2019Review
- Understanding patients' satisfaction with physician assistant/associate encounters through communication experiences: a qualitative study in acute hospitals in England.BMC health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the modern hospital environment, increasing possibilities in medical examination techniques and increasing documentation tasks claim the physicians' energy and encroach on their time spent with patients. This study aimed to investigate how much time physicians at hospital wards spend on communication with patients and their families and how much time they spend on other specific work tasks.
methodsA non-participatory, observational study was conducted in thirty-six wards at the University Medical Center Freiburg, a 1700-bed academic hospital in Germany. All wards belonging to the clinics of internal medicine, surgery, radiology, neurology, and to the clinic for gynaecology took part in the study. Thirty-four ward doctors from fifteen different medical departments were observed during a randomly chosen complete work day. The Physicians' time for communication with patients and relatives and time spent on different working tasks during one day of work were assessed.
results374 working hours were analysed. On average, a physician's workday on a university hospital ward added up to 658.91 minutes (10 hrs 58 min; range 490 - 848 min). Looking at single items of time consumption on the evaluation sheet, discussions with colleagues ranked first with 150 minutes on average. Documentation and administrative requirements took an average time of 148 minutes per day and ranked second. Total time for communication with patients and their relatives was 85 minutes per physician and day. Consequently, the available time for communication was 4 minutes and 17 seconds for each patient on the ward and 20 seconds for his or her relatives. Physicians assessed themselves to communicate twice as long with patients and sevenfold with relatives than they did according to this study.
conclusionsWorkload and time pressure for physicians working on hospital wards are high. To offer excellent medical treatment combined with patient centred care and to meet the needs of patients and relatives on hospital wards, physicians should be given more time to focus on core clinical tasks. Time and health care management solutions to minimize time pressure are required. Further research is needed to assess quality of communication in hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.