Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20380721›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Optimization algorithms for functional deimmunization of therapeutic proteins.

Andrew S Parker, Wei Zheng, Karl E Griswold, Chris Bailey-Kellogg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. FoldX as Protein Engineering Tool: Better Than Random Based Approaches?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Computationally optimized deimmunization libraries yield highly mutated enzymes with low immunogenicity and enhanced activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Design and engineering of deimmunized biotherapeutics.Current opinion in structural biology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Removing T-cell epitopes with computational protein design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew S ParkerDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Wei Zheng
Karl E Griswold
Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop protein therapeutics from exogenous sources, it is necessary to mitigate the risks of eliciting an anti-biotherapeutic immune response. A key aspect of the response is the recognition and surface display by antigen-presenting cells of epitopes, short peptide fragments derived from the foreign protein. Thus, developing minimal-epitope variants represents a powerful approach to deimmunizing protein therapeutics. Critically, mutations selected to reduce immunogenicity must not interfere with the protein's therapeutic activity.

resultsThis paper develops methods to improve the likelihood of simultaneously reducing the anti-biotherapeutic immune response while maintaining therapeutic activity. A dynamic programming approach identifies optimal and near-optimal sets of conservative point mutations to minimize the occurrence of predicted T-cell epitopes in a target protein. In contrast with existing methods, those described here integrate analysis of immunogenicity and stability/activity, are broadly applicable to any protein class, guarantee global optimality, and provide sufficient flexibility for users to limit the total number of mutations and target MHC alleles of interest. The input is simply the primary amino acid sequence of the therapeutic candidate, although crystal structures and protein family sequence alignments may also be input when available. The output is a scored list of sets of point mutations predicted to reduce the protein's immunogenicity while maintaining structure and function. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in a number of case study applications, showing that, in general, our best variants are predicted to be better than those produced by previous deimmunization efforts in terms of either immunogenicity or stability, or both factors.

conclusionsBy developing global optimization algorithms leveraging well-established immunogenicity and stability prediction techniques, we provide the protein engineer with a mechanism for exploring the favorable sequence space near a targeted protein therapeutic. Our mechanism not only helps identify designs more likely to be effective, but also provides insights into the interrelated implications of design choices.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyEpitopes, T-LymphocyteMolecular Sequence DataProtein EngineeringProtein FoldingProteinsEpitopes, T-LymphocyteProteins

Identifiers

PMID20380721
PMCPMC2873530
OpenAlexW2170174589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.