ArticleParasitology research2010
Fennoscandian distribution of an important parasite of cervids, the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi), revisited.
Article in Parasitology research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distribution ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
- Interactions between the autochthonous deer kedParasitology · 2025Article
- Large mammal telomere length variation across ecoregions.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Host in reserve: The role of common shrews (Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Distribution, prevalence and intensity of moose nose bot fly (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021Article
- Two New Haplotypes ofInsects · 2021Article
- Exposure of Humans to Attacks by Deer Keds and Consequences of Their Bites-A Case Report with Environmental Background.Insects · 2020Article
- Temporal-Microclimatic Factors Affect the Phenology ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Range expansion and reproduction of the ectoparasitic deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) in its novel host, the Arctic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus), in Finland.Parasitology research · 2020Article
- Article
- The northernmost record of a blood-sucking ectoparasite,Biodiversity data journal · 2019Article
- Molecular detection of Bartonella spp. in deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) in Poland.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
- Phenology of deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) host-seeking flight activity and its relationship with prevailing autumn weather.Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- Molecular detection of Bartonella spp. in deer ked pupae, adult keds and moose blood in Finland.Epidemiology and infection · 2015Article
- Acute impacts of the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) infestation on reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) behaviour.Parasitology research · 2014Article
- Cephenemyia stimulator and Hypoderma diana infection of roe deer in the Czech Republic over an 8-year period.Parasitology research · 2013Article
- Bartonella infections in deer keds (Lipoptena cervi) and moose (Alces alces) in Norway.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Factors affecting deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) prevalence and infestation intensity in moose (Alces alces) in Norway.Parasites & vectors · 2012Article
- The effects of an abundant ectoparasite, the deer ked (Lipoptena cervi), on the health of moose (Alces alces) in Finland.Parasitology research · 2012Article
- Geographical variation in host use of a blood-feeding ectoparasitic fly: implications for population invasiveness.Oecologia · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The deer ked [Lipoptena cervi (L. 1758) (Dipt., Hippoboscidae)] is a blood-sucking ectoparasite of cervids. The species has been resident in Sweden for more than two centuries, whereas in Finland ( approximately 50 years) and Norway ( approximately 30 years), it has established itself relatively recently. L. cervi may cause serious health problems in its natural hosts, act as a vector for zoonotic diseases, and pose a socioeconomic threat to forest-based activity. In this paper, we review the distribution and former expansion of the species in Fennoscandia. The current distribution of L. cervi appears bimodal, and the geographical range expansion of the species shows notable differences across Fennoscandia. The western population in Norway and Sweden has its northern edge of range at respective latitudes of 61 degrees N and 62 degrees N, whereas the eastern population in Finland reaches 65 degrees N. The future expansion of L. cervi is dependent on several interdependent extrinsic and intrinsic factors. International multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to achieve a synthesis on the factors affecting expansion rates and to understand the effects of L. cervi on wildlife, human health, and the rural societies of Fennoscandia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20379833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.