Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20379742›Full record

Trial reportVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2010

Electronic reminders for pathologists promote recognition of patients at risk for Lynch syndrome: cluster-randomised controlled trial.

L I Overbeek, R P Hermens, J H van Krieken, E M Adang, M Casparie, F M Nagengast, M J Ligtenberg, N Hoogerbrugge, MIPA study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00141466 (Cost Effectiveness of Two Different Implementation Procedures to Change Clinicians Practice Roles in the Detection of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00141466 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cost Effectiveness of Two Different Implementation Procedures to Change Clinicians Practice Roles in the Detection of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2005 to 2007Enrolled360ConditionsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal CancerArmsEducation for professionals, Distribution of educational materials, Feedback for professionals, Reminders for professionals
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Clinical decision support for genetically guided personalized medicine: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The effect of genotypes and parent of origin on cancer risk and age of cancer development in PMS2 mutation carriers.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L I OverbeekDepartment of Human Genetics 849, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
R P Hermens
J H van Krieken
E M Adang
M Casparie
F M Nagengast
M J Ligtenberg
N Hoogerbrugge
MIPA study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated success factors for the introduction of a guideline on recognition of Lynch syndrome in patients recently diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) below age 50 or a second CRC below age 70. Pathologists were asked to start microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and report to surgeons with the advice to consider genetic counselling when MSI test or family history was positive. A multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00141466) was performed in 12 pathology laboratories (clusters), serving 29 community hospitals. All received an introduction to the new guideline. In the intervention group, surgeons received education and tumour test result reminders; pathologists were provided with inclusion criteria cards, an electronic patient inclusion reminder system and feedback on inclusion. Two hundred sixty-six CRC patients were eligible for recognition as at risk for Lynch syndrome. The actual recognition was 18% more successful in the intervention as compared to the control arm (77% (120 of 156) compared to 59% (65 of 110)), with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-7.0). The electronic reminder system for pathologists was most strongly associated with recognition of high-risk patients, OR = 4.2 (95% CI 1.7-10.1). An electronic reminder system for pathologists appeared effective for adherence to a new complex guideline and will enhance the recognition of Lynch syndrome.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityPathologyReminder SystemsColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisHumansMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk

Identifiers

PMID20379742
PMCPMC2880231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.