Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20378636›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010

Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial.

Pippa Oakeshott, Sally Kerry, Adamma Aghaizu, Helen Atherton, Sima Hay, David Taylor-Robinson, Ian Simms, Phillip Hay

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00115388 (Community-Based Trial of Screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis to Prevent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 122 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00115388 nacompletednot on this map

Community-Based Trial of Screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis to Prevent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt George's, University of LondonRan2004 to 2008Enrolled2,531ConditionsPelvic Inflammatory Disease, Chlamydia InfectionsArmsScreening for chlamydia using self-taken vaginal swabs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 334 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Recommendation on screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care for individuals not known to be at high risk.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Topical microbicides for preventing sexually transmitted infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2015
    Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Pippa OakeshottDivision of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London SW17 0RE. oakeshot@sgul.ac.uk
Sally Kerry
Adamma Aghaizu
Helen Atherton
Sima Hay
David Taylor-Robinson
Ian Simms
Phillip Hay
St George's, University of London · GBImperial College London · GBHealth Protection Agency · MVKing's College London · GBSt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether screening and treating women for chlamydial infection reduces the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease over the subsequent 12 months.

designRandomised controlled trial.

settingCommon rooms, lecture theatres, and student bars at universities and further education colleges in London.

participants2529 sexually active female students, mean age 21 years (range 16-27).

interventionParticipants completed a questionnaire and provided self taken vaginal swabs, with follow-up after one year. Samples were randomly allocated to immediate testing and treatment for chlamydial infection, or storage and analysis after a year (deferred screening controls).

main outcome measureIncidence of clinical pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months.

resultsBaseline prevalence of chlamydia was 5.4% (68/1254) in screened women and 5.9% (75/1265) in controls. 94% (2377/2529) of women were followed up after 12 months. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 1.3% (15/1191) in screened women compared with 1.9% (23/1186) in controls (relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.22). Seven of 74 control women (9.5%, 95% confidence interval 4.7% to 18.3%) who tested positive for chlamydial infection at baseline developed pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months compared with one of 63 (1.6%) screened women (relative risk 0.17, 0.03 to 1.01). However, most episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease occurred in women who tested negative for chlamydia at baseline (79%, 30/38). 22% (527/2377) of women reported being tested independently for chlamydia during the trial.

conclusionAlthough some evidence suggests that screening for chlamydia reduces rates of pelvic inflammatory disease, especially in women with chlamydial infection at baseline, the effectiveness of a single chlamydia test in preventing pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months may have been overestimated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115388.

Indexed as

Chlamydia trachomatisAdolescentChlamydia InfectionsFemaleHumansIncidenceLondonMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPelvic Inflammatory DiseaseSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20378636
PMCPMC2851939
OpenAlexW2100223549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.