ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
Protein sequences classification by means of feature extraction with substitution matrices.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein sequence analysis in the context of drug repurposing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Research Trends in Africa: A 30 Years Overview with Bibliometric Analysis Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023Review
- Bioinformatics approaches for classification and investigation of the evolution of the Na/K-ATPase alpha-subunit.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- PDAUG: a Galaxy based toolset for peptide library analysis, visualization, and machine learning modeling.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Profiles of Natural and Designed Protein-Like Sequences Effectively Bridge Protein Sequence Gaps: Implications in Distant Homology Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- FEPS: A Tool for Feature Extraction from Protein Sequence.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Network-based protein structural classification.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Machine learning predicts new anti-CRISPR proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Multimodal deep representation learning for protein interaction identification and protein family classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Article
- An empirical study of different approaches for protein classification.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
- Efficient feature selection and classification of protein sequence data in bioinformatics.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper deals with the preprocessing of protein sequences for supervised classification. Motif extraction is one way to address that task. It has been largely used to encode biological sequences into feature vectors to enable using well-known machine-learning classifiers which require this format. However, designing a suitable feature space, for a set of proteins, is not a trivial task. For this purpose, we propose a novel encoding method that uses amino-acid substitution matrices to define similarity between motifs during the extraction step.
resultsIn order to demonstrate the efficiency of such approach, we compare several encoding methods using some machine learning classifiers. The experimental results showed that our encoding method outperforms other ones in terms of classification accuracy and number of generated attributes. We also compared the classifiers in term of accuracy. Results indicated that SVM generally outperforms the other classifiers with any encoding method. We showed that SVM, coupled with our encoding method, can be an efficient protein classification system. In addition, we studied the effect of the substitution matrices variation on the quality of our method and hence on the classification quality. We noticed that our method enables good classification accuracies with all the substitution matrices and that the variances of the obtained accuracies using various substitution matrices are slight. However, the number of generated features varies from a substitution matrix to another. Furthermore, the use of already published datasets allowed us to carry out a comparison with several related works.
conclusionsThe outcomes of our comparative experiments confirm the efficiency of our encoding method to represent protein sequences in classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.