Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20377887›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Protein sequences classification by means of feature extraction with substitution matrices.

Rabie Saidi, Mondher Maddouri, Engelbert Mephu Nguifo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protein sequence analysis in the context of drug repurposing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  2. Machine Learning Research Trends in Africa: A 30 Years Overview with Bibliometric Analysis Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. FEPS: A Tool for Feature Extraction from Protein Sequence.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Network-based protein structural classification.Royal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rabie SaidiLIMOS - Blaise Pascal University - Clermont University, BP 10448, Clermont-Ferrand 63000, France.
Mondher Maddouri
Engelbert Mephu Nguifo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper deals with the preprocessing of protein sequences for supervised classification. Motif extraction is one way to address that task. It has been largely used to encode biological sequences into feature vectors to enable using well-known machine-learning classifiers which require this format. However, designing a suitable feature space, for a set of proteins, is not a trivial task. For this purpose, we propose a novel encoding method that uses amino-acid substitution matrices to define similarity between motifs during the extraction step.

resultsIn order to demonstrate the efficiency of such approach, we compare several encoding methods using some machine learning classifiers. The experimental results showed that our encoding method outperforms other ones in terms of classification accuracy and number of generated attributes. We also compared the classifiers in term of accuracy. Results indicated that SVM generally outperforms the other classifiers with any encoding method. We showed that SVM, coupled with our encoding method, can be an efficient protein classification system. In addition, we studied the effect of the substitution matrices variation on the quality of our method and hence on the classification quality. We noticed that our method enables good classification accuracies with all the substitution matrices and that the variances of the obtained accuracies using various substitution matrices are slight. However, the number of generated features varies from a substitution matrix to another. Furthermore, the use of already published datasets allowed us to carry out a comparison with several related works.

conclusionsThe outcomes of our comparative experiments confirm the efficiency of our encoding method to represent protein sequences in classification tasks.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, ProteinAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionArtificial IntelligenceDatabases, ProteinMolecular Sequence DataProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Amino AcidProteins

Identifiers

PMID20377887
PMCPMC2868007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.