ArticleParasites & vectors2010
Comparison of selected canine vector-borne diseases between urban animal shelter and rural hunting dogs in Korea.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of diagnostic methods and genetic analysis for canine vector-borne diseases in Thailand.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Molecular detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in field-collected Haemaphysalis larvae in the Republic of Korea.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Serological investigation of seven zoonotic pathogens in companion dogs in South Korea, 2018-2021.Veterinary medicine and science · 2024Article
- Co-infection patterns of vector-borne zoonotic pathogens in owned free-ranging dogs in central Chile.Veterinary research communications · 2023Article
- Ehrlichiosis in Dogs: A Comprehensive Review about the Pathogen and Its Vectors with Emphasis on South and East Asian Countries.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- Serological evidence ofJournal of veterinary science · 2022Article
- Identity of Microfilariae Circulating in Dogs from Western and South-Western Romania in the Last Decade.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Presence and Characterization of Zoonotic Bacterial Pathogens in Wild Boar Hunting Dogs (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Efficacy of milbemycin oxime/afoxolaner chewable tablets (NEXGARD SPECTRAParasites & vectors · 2021Article
- Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Seroprevalence ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Geographical Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Molecular Detection and Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Simultaneous Detection of Parasitic Vector Borne Diseases: A Robust Cross-Sectional Survey in Hunting, Stray and Sheep Dogs in a Mediterranean Area.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019Article
- Dogs as New Hosts for the Emerging Zoonotic PathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019Article
- Zoonotic Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, and spotted fever group rickettsiae (SFGR) in different types of dogs.Parasitology research · 2018Article
- Assessment of using recombinant Ixodes ricinus AV422 saliva protein for confirmation of tick bites in hunting dogs as naturally infested hosts.Experimental & applied acarology · 2017Article
- Anaplasma spp. in dogs and owners in north-western Morocco.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
- Serological and molecular prevalence of canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) in Korea.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
- Serological Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi among Horses in Korea.The Korean journal of parasitology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A serological survey for Dirofilaria immitis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, and Borrelia burgdorferi infections in rural hunting and urban shelter dogs mainly from southwestern regions of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) was conducted. From a total of 229 wild boar or pheasant hunting dogs, the number of serologically positive dogs for any of the four pathogens was 93 (40.6%). The highest prevalence observed was D. immitis (22.3%), followed by A. phagocytophilum (18.8%), E. canis (6.1%) and the lowest prevalence was B. burgdorferi (2.2%). In contrast, stray dogs found within the city limits of Gwangju showed seropositivity only to D. immitis (14.6%), and none of the 692 dogs responded positive for A. phagocytophilum, E. canis or B. burgdorferi antibodies. This study indicates that the risk of exposure to vector-borne diseases in rural hunting dogs can be quite high in Korea, while the urban environment may not be suitable for tick infestation on dogs, as evidenced by the low infection status of tick-borne pathogens in stray dogs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.