ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2010
Staphylococcus aureus positive skin infections and international travel.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Skin Grafts: Where Biomaterials Meet Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2019Review
- Advanced therapies of skin injuries.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2015Review
- Testing spatiotemporal hypothesis of bacterial evolution using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST239 genome-wide data within a bayesian framework.Molecular biology and evolution · 2011Article
- MicroDSC study of Staphylococcus epidermidis growth.BMC microbiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of purulent skin infections in travellers returning from the tropics and subtropics. This review gives an account of the current knowledge on travel-related, S. aureus positive skin infections with a focus on recent findings on both bacterial pathogenicity and mechanisms of innate defence. In particular, the potential role of community-acquired methicillin-resistance, Panton-Valentine leukocidin as well as antimicrobial peptides in the evolution of this type of infection are discussed. Moreover, conflicting findings for a possible association of travel and migration with the global emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections are summarised. This review highlights areas of uncertainty that require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.