ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2010
New medicines for malaria.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of new medicines for malaria is a challenging and important topic of applied research because malarial parasites rapidly adapt to man-made interventions. Best studied examples are widely used drugs such as chloroquine, sulfadoxin-pyrimethamine (SP), and, recently, artemisinins; all of them can lose efficacy after large-scale introduction. In addition to drugs, malaria vaccines re-emerged on the agenda of funding bodies and research institutions after a period of quietness and desperation. This time the communities' aims are high: a registered and effective malaria-vaccine. So far, only one candidate shows modest efficacy, a quantum leap in malaria vaccine research, whereas others have not met the high expectations. In this overview, I will summarize basic thoughts and principles behind our work and illustrate them with examples of current projects of my group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20376719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.