ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2010
Recent developments and future challenges on imaging for stem cell research.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in iron-storage protein-based MRI reporter genes: from molecular mechanisms to translational imaging applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Manganese-Zinc Ferrites: Safe and Efficient Nanolabels for Cell Imaging and Tracking In Vivo.ChemistryOpen · 2019Article
- Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of transplanted stem cell fate in stroke.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2014Review
- Molecular imaging: the key to advancing cardiac stem cell therapy.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2013Review
- Molecular advances in reporter genes: the need to witness the function of stem cells in failing heart in vivo.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2012Review
- Imaging Cell Therapy for Myocardial Regeneration.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2012Article
- In vivo imaging for stem cell therapy: new developments and future challenges.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As clinical trials with stem cells for cardiac regenerative therapy move forward, advances in imaging equipment and technique offer powerful methods to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Methodologies to label stem cells for tracking continue to expand. Non-invasive imaging offers the potential to better understand the interaction of exogenous stem cells with the host to answer questions such as the best cell type(s), timing of delivery, dose, and delivery route. If successful, these techniques may enable individually tailored dosing of stem cell therapeutics. However, techniques that are suitable for animal models of cardiac disease may have hurdles to clinical translation beyond simple biocompatibility issues. Challenges include the high cost of advanced imaging techniques, applicability in acute ischemic disease, and regulatory approval. In this review, we will cover some new imaging techniques and labeling strategies and assess the obstacles to clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.