Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20375848›Full record

SynthesisJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2010

Effect of directly observed therapy for highly active antiretroviral therapy on virologic, immunologic, and adherence outcomes: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Jessica E Hart, Christie Y Jeon, Louise C Ivers, Heidi L Behforouz, Adolfo Caldas, Peter C Drobac, Sonya S Shin

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Lack of sustained improvement in adherence or viral load following a directly observed antiretroviral therapy intervention.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica E HartThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Christie Y Jeon
Louise C Ivers
Heidi L Behforouz
Adolfo Caldas
Peter C Drobac
Sonya S Shin
Partners In Health · USHarvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · US

Funding

PROGRAM FOR AIDS CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING (PACRT)T32AI007433 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARK J SIEDNER · 1992 to 2026
$11.4M
Tailored nutrition and food security interventions in comprehensive HIV careR01HD057627 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI IVERS, LOUISE C. · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
Identifying HIV and related stigma in rural HaitiK23AI063998 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI IVERS, LOUISE C. · 2005 to 2009
$667k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI063998NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007433NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057627PHS HHS T32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDirectly observed therapy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (DOT-HAART) is a feasible adherence intervention. Prospective DOT-HAART studies have shown mixed results, and optimal target groups have yet to be defined. We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to assess the effect of DOT-HAART on adherence and virologic and immunologic response.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive search through August 2009 to identify peer-reviewed controlled studies that involved outpatient DOT-HAART among adults and reported at least 1 outcome assessed in this meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed; differences in effect on virologic suppression were examined using stratified meta-analyses and meta-regression on several study characteristics.

resultsSeventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Compared with control groups, DOT-HAART recipients were more likely to achieve an undetectable viral load (random effects risk ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08 to 1.41), a greater increase in CD4 cell count (random effects weighted mean difference 43 cells/microL, 95% CI: 12 to 74 cells/microL), and HAART adherence of > or =95% (random effects risk ratio 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.32). Results varied with respect to virologic response. DOT-HAART did not have a significant effect on virologic suppression when restricted to randomized controlled studies. Post-treatment effect was not observed in a limited number of studies.

conclusionsDOT-HAART had a significant effect on virologic, immunologic, and adherence outcomes, although its efficacy was not supported when restricting analysis to randomized controlled trials. DOT-HAART shows greatest treatment effect when targeting individuals with greater risk of nonadherence and when delivering the intervention that maximizes participant convenience and provides enhanced adherence support. Further investigation is needed to assess the postintervention effect and cost-effectiveness of DOT-HAART.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountConfidence IntervalsDirectly Observed TherapyFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleOdds RatioRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeViral Load

Identifiers

PMID20375848
PMCPMC4022185
OpenAlexW2019312361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.