ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010
Multilevel support vector regression analysis to identify condition-specific regulatory networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Labelled regulatory elements are pervasive features of the macrophage genome and are dynamically utilized by classical and alternative polarization signals.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- IODNE: An integrated optimization method for identifying the deregulated subnetwork for precision medicine in cancer.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017Review
- A new asynchronous parallel algorithm for inferring large-scale gene regulatory networks.PloS one · 2015Article
- WMAXC: a weighted maximum clique method for identifying condition-specific sub-network.PloS one · 2014Article
- Identifying protein interaction subnetworks by a bagging Markov random field-based method.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Identifying subspace gene clusters from microarray data using low-rank representation.PloS one · 2013Article
- Robust identification of transcriptional regulatory networks using a Gibbs sampler on outlier sum statistic.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- TANGLE: two-level support vector regression approach for protein backbone torsion angle prediction from primary sequences.PloS one · 2012Article
- PROSPER: an integrated feature-based tool for predicting protease substrate cleavage sites.PloS one · 2012Article
- Endoplasmic reticulum stress, the unfolded protein response, and gene network modeling in antiestrogen resistant breast cancer.Hormone molecular biology and clinical investigation · 2011Article
- Reconstruction of transcriptional regulatory networks by stability-based network component analysis.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe identification of gene regulatory modules is an important yet challenging problem in computational biology. While many computational methods have been proposed to identify regulatory modules, their initial success is largely compromised by a high rate of false positives, especially when applied to human cancer studies. New strategies are needed for reliable regulatory module identification.
resultsWe present a new approach, namely multilevel support vector regression (ml-SVR), to systematically identify condition-specific regulatory modules. The approach is built upon a multilevel analysis strategy designed for suppressing false positive predictions. With this strategy, a regulatory module becomes ever more significant as more relevant gene sets are formed at finer levels. At each level, a two-stage support vector regression (SVR) method is utilized to help reduce false positive predictions by integrating binding motif information and gene expression data; a significant analysis procedure is followed to assess the significance of each regulatory module. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, we first compared the ml-SVR approach with other existing methods on simulation data and yeast cell cycle data. The resulting performance shows that the ml-SVR approach outperforms other methods in the identification of both regulators and their target genes. We then applied our method to breast cancer cell line data to identify condition-specific regulatory modules associated with estrogen treatment. Experimental results show that our method can identify biologically meaningful regulatory modules related to estrogen signaling and action in breast cancer. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The ml-SVR MATLAB package can be downloaded at http://www.cbil.ece.vt.edu/software.htm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.