Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20374746›Full record

ReviewProgress in molecular biology and translational science2009

Viral strategies to subvert the mammalian translation machinery.

Lisa O Roberts, Catherine L Jopling, Richard J Jackson, Anne E Willis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in molecular biology and translational science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Translational Regulation in Hepatocellular Carcinogenesis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021
    Review
  6. Translational control of coronaviruses.Nucleic acids research · 2020
    Review
  7. In-Depth Bioinformatic Analyses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A perspective on mammalian upstream open reading frame function.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa O RobertsFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Catherine L Jopling
Richard J Jackson
Anne E Willis
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses do not carry their own protein biosynthesis machinery and the translation of viral proteins therefore requires that the virus usurps the machinery of the host cell. To allow optimal translation of viral proteins at the expense of cellular proteins, virus families have evolved a variety of methods to repress the host translation machinery, while allowing effective viral protein synthesis. Many viruses use noncanonical mechanisms that permit translation of their own RNAs under these conditions. Viruses have also developed mechanisms to evade host innate immune responses that would repress translation under conditions of viral infection, in particular PKR activation in response to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Importantly, the study of viral translation mechanisms has enormously enhanced our understanding of many aspects of the cellular protein biosynthesis pathway and its components. A number of unusual mechanisms of translation initiation that were first discovered in viruses have since been observed in cellular mRNAs, and it has become apparent that a diverse range of translation mechanisms operates in eukaryotes, allowing subtle regulation of this essential process.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisAnimalsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2Host-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMammalsPhosphorylationViral ProteinsVirusesEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2Viral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20374746
PMCPMC7102724
OpenAlexW1490158396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.