ArticleBiometrics2011
A penalized likelihood approach for bivariate conditional normal models for dynamic co-expression analysis.
Article in Biometrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible copula model for integrating correlated multi-omics data from single-cell experiments.Biometrics · 2023Article
- Generalized Liquid Association Analysis for Multimodal Data Integration.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023Article
- A hypergraph-based method for large-scale dynamic correlation study at the transcriptomic scale.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- A new dynamic correlation algorithm reveals novel functional aspects in single cell and bulk RNA-seq data.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Detecting subnetwork-level dynamic correlations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- A network based covariance test for detecting multivariate eQTL in saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Nonlinear Network Reconstruction from Gene Expression Data Using Marginal Dependencies Measured by DCOL.PloS one · 2016Article
- The Detection of Metabolite-Mediated Gene Module Co-Expression Using Multivariate Linear Models.PloS one · 2016Article
- Statistical analysis reveals co-expression patterns of many pairs of genes in yeast are jointly regulated by interacting loci.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene co-expressions have been widely used in the analysis of microarray gene expression data. However, the co-expression patterns between two genes can be mediated by cellular states, as reflected by expression of other genes, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and activity of protein kinases. In this article, we introduce a bivariate conditional normal model for identifying the variables that can mediate the co-expression patterns between two genes. Based on this model, we introduce a likelihood ratio (LR) test and a penalized likelihood procedure for identifying the mediators that affect gene co-expression patterns. We propose an efficient computational algorithm based on iterative reweighted least squares and cyclic coordinate descent and have shown that when the tuning parameter in the penalized likelihood is appropriately selected, such a procedure has the oracle property in selecting the variables. We present simulation results to compare with existing methods and show that the LR-based approach can perform similarly or better than the existing method of liquid association and the penalized likelihood procedure can be quite effective in selecting the mediators. We apply the proposed method to yeast gene expression data in order to identify the kinases or single nucleotide polymorphisms that mediate the co-expression patterns between genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.