Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20373907›Full record

Trial reportJournal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery2010

Evaluation of the Target Inhalation Mode (TIM) breathing maneuver in simulated nebulizer therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis.

John Denyer, Ivan Prince, Emma Dixon, Penny Agent, Jennifer Pryor, Margaret Hodson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06157515 (Inhaled Dose Analysis Using a Breath Actuated Nebulizer in Healthy Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06157515 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Inhaled Dose Analysis Using a Breath Actuated Nebulizer in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsHealthy Volunteers, Aerosol Therapy, Inhaled Drug Dose, Pharmacogenomic Drug InteractionArmsBreath-actuated vibrating mesh nebulizer, Continuous vibrating mesh nebulizer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) technology: Past, present, and future.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2010
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John DenyerPhilips Respironics, Respiratory Drug Delivery Ltd, Chichester, United Kingdom. john.denyer@philips.com
Ivan Prince
Emma Dixon
Penny Agent
Jennifer Pryor
Margaret Hodson
Royal Brompton Hospital · GBPhilips (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) systems provide efficient drug delivery and improved lung deposition over conventional nebulizers by combining real-time analyses of patient breathing patterns and precisely timed aerosol delivery. Delivery and deposition are further enhanced by breathing techniques involving slow, deep inhalations.

methodsThis exploratory study assessed the acceptability of slow, deep inhalations in 20 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) during up to eight simulated nebulizer treatments with the I-neb AAD System. The breathing maneuver, Target Inhalation Mode (TIM) breathing, involved the lengthening of the patient's inhalation time over successive breaths with guidance from auditory and tactile (vibratory) feedback from the device.

resultsAt the end of the first treatment, most patients felt that the instructions were easy to understand (90%) and that the vibratory feedback was pleasant (65%). Half of the patients found the procedure to be comfortable. At the end of the final treatment, most patients felt that the breathing maneuver was easy to understand (90%) and use (80%), but that the duration of the breath was too long (100%). Logged data revealed that 90% of patients were able to comply with the breathing maneuver. The two patients unable to comply had a forced vital capacity of <1.75 L. The average treatment time decreased from 288.4 to 141.6 sec during the first and final treatments, respectively.

conclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence of the acceptability of the TIM breathing maneuver in patients with CF and their ability to perform repeated TIM breathing during simulated nebulizer therapy with the I-neb AAD System.

Indexed as

Nebulizers and VaporizersPatient Acceptance of Health CareRespiratory MechanicsAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAerosolsCystic FibrosisDrug Delivery SystemsFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmaceutical PreparationsTechnology, PharmaceuticalAerosolsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID20373907
PMCPMC3116626
OpenAlexW2081437136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.