Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20373669›Full record

ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2010

Genetics of drug dependence.

Joel Gelernter, Henry R Kranzler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Altered Actin Filament Dynamics in theThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex-specific linkage scans in opioid dependence.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2017
    Article
  7. No association betweenMolecular biology research communications · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Association betweenMolecular biology research communications · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel GelernterDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA joel.gelernter@yale.edu
Henry R Kranzler

Funding

Sex-specific analysis of opioid dependence GWAS and beyondR01DA012690 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2000 to 2017
$14.0M
GENETICS OF COCAINE DEPENDENCER01DA012849 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 1999 to 2010
$11.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012690NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012849NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA12849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-dependence disorders (we focus here on cocaine, opioid, and nicotine dependence) are genetically influenced. Risk genes have been located based primarily on genetic linkage studies, and identified primarily based on genetic association studies. In this article we review salient results from linkage, association, and genome-wide association study methodologies, and discuss future prospects for risk allele identification based on these, and on newer, methodologies. Although considerable progress has been made, it is likely that the application of more extensive sequencing than has previously been practical will be required to identify a fuller range of risk variants.

Indexed as

GeneticsGenetic LinkageGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID20373669
PMCPMC3181942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.