Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20372994›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2010

Orphan nuclear receptors as targets for drug development.

Subhajit Mukherjee, Sridhar Mani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bilirubin metabolism and its application in disease prevention: mechanisms and research advances.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  2. Natural medicinal compounds target signal transduction pathways to overcome ABC drug efflux transporter-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The orphan nuclear receptors at their 25-year reunion.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2013
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bile acids regulate cardiovascular function.Clinical and translational science · 2011
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Subhajit MukherjeeDepartment of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Chanin 302-D1, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
Sridhar Mani
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Chemical Modulation of Orphan Nuclear Receptor FunctionR01CA127231 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MANI, SRIDHAR · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01 CA127231-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orphan nuclear receptors regulate diverse biological processes. These important molecules are ligand-activated transcription factors that act as natural sensors for a wide range of steroid hormones and xenobiotic ligands. Because of their importance in regulating various novel signaling pathways, recent research has focused on identifying xenobiotics targeting these receptors for the treatment of multiple human diseases. In this review, we will highlight these receptors in several physiologic and pathophysiologic actions and demonstrate how their functions can be exploited for the successful development of newer drugs.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignOrphan Nuclear ReceptorsHumansLigandsModels, BiologicalLigandsOrphan Nuclear Receptors

Identifiers

PMID20372994
PMCPMC3518931
OpenAlexW2074358735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.