ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2010
Structural determination of biomolecular interfaces by nuclear magnetic resonance of proteins with reduced proton density.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Determination of Interacting Protein Surfaces in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes by Using In-Cell NMR Spectroscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018Article
- Determination of ligand binding modes in weak protein-ligand complexes using sparse NMR data.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2016Article
- Identification of Hydrophobic Interfaces in Protein-Ligand Complexes by Selective Saturation Transfer NMR Spectroscopy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- On the potential of hyperpolarized water in biomolecular NMR studies.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014Article
- A segmental labeling strategy for unambiguous determination of domain-domain interactions of large multi-domain proteins.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Protein interactions are important for understanding many molecular mechanisms underlying cellular processes. So far, interfaces between interacting proteins have been characterized by NMR spectroscopy mostly by using chemical shift perturbations and cross-saturation via intermolecular cross-relaxation. Although powerful, these techniques cannot provide unambiguous estimates of intermolecular distances between interacting proteins. Here, we present an alternative approach, called REDSPRINT (REDduced/Standard PRoton density INTerface identification), to map protein interfaces with greater accuracy by using multiple NMR probes. Our approach is based on monitoring the cross-relaxation from a source protein (or from an arbitrary ligand that need not be a protein) with high proton density to a target protein (or other biomolecule) with low proton density by using isotope-filtered nuclear Overhauser spectroscopy (NOESY). This methodology uses different isotropic labeling for the source and target proteins to identify the source-target interface and also determine the proton density of the source protein at the interface for protein-protein or protein-ligand docking. Simulation indicates significant gains in sensitivity because of the resultant relaxation properties, and the utility of this technique, including a method for direct determination of the protein interface, is demonstrated for two different protein-protein complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.