Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20371643›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2010

Mapping plant interactomes using literature curated and predicted protein-protein interaction data sets.

KiYoung Lee, David Thorneycroft, Premanand Achuthan, Henning Hermjakob, Trey Ideker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CaFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteome-wide remodeling of protein location and function by stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Curation accuracy of model organism databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Arabidopsis peroxisome proteomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

KiYoung LeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 443-749, Korea. kiylee@ajou.ac.kr
David Thorneycroft
Premanand Achuthan
Henning Hermjakob
Trey Ideker

Funding

Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01GM070743 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2004 to 2016
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM070743NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cellular processes are enabled by cohorts of interacting proteins that form dynamic networks within the plant proteome. The study of these networks can provide insight into protein function and provide new avenues for research. This article informs the plant science community of the currently available sources of protein interaction data and discusses how they can be useful to researchers. Using our recently curated IntAct Arabidopsis thaliana protein-protein interaction data set as an example, we discuss potentials and limitations of the plant interactomes generated to date. In addition, we present our efforts to add value to the interaction data by using them to seed a proteome-wide map of predicted protein subcellular locations.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein Interaction MappingArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsComputational BiologyProteomeArabidopsis ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID20371643
PMCPMC2879763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.