Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20370701›Full record

ReviewMini reviews in medicinal chemistry2010

Bioavailability challenges associated with development of anti-cancer phenolics.

Song Gao, Ming Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Encapsulation ofACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Sorafenib and Piperine co-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: Development, characterization, and anti-cancer activity against hepatocellular carcinoma cell line.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nano-Drug Delivery Systems Based on Natural Products.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Song GaoDepartment of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 1441 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Ming Hu

Funding

Disposition of Flavonoids via Metabolic InterplayR01GM070737 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI HU, MING · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM070737NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenolics including many polyphenols and flavonoids have the potentials to become chemoprevention and chemotherapy agents. However, poor bioavailability limits their biological effects in vivo. This paper reviews the factors that affect phenolics absorption and their bioavailabilities from the points of view of their physicochemical properties and disposition in the gastrointestinal tract. The up-to-date research data suggested that solubility and metabolism are the primary reasons that limit phenolic aglycones' bioavailability although stability and poor permeation may also contribute to the poor bioavailabilities of the glycosides. Future investigations should further optimize phenolics' bioavailabilities and realize their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic effects in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological AvailabilityClinical Trials as TopicFlavonoidsHumansNeoplasmsPhenolsPolyphenolsRatsAnticarcinogenic AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsFlavonoidsPhenolsPolyphenols

Identifiers

PMID20370701
PMCPMC2919492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.