Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20369834›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2010

Characterization of aziridinylbenzoquinone DNA cross-links by liquid chromatography-infrared multiphoton dissociation-mass spectrometry.

Sarah E Pierce, Lynn J Guziec, Frank S Guziec, Jennifer S Brodbelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Hypoxia-active nanoparticles used in tumor theranostic.International journal of nanomedicine · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Comparison of MS/MS methods for characterization of DNA/cisplatin adducts.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2013
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E PierceDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Lynn J Guziec
Frank S Guziec
Jennifer S Brodbelt

Funding

Design and Characterization of DNA Interactive AgentsR01GM065956 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI BRODBELT, JENNIFER S. · 2003 to 2011
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065956NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM65956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA cross-linking was evaluated by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine the relative cross-linking abilities of two aziridinylbenzoquinones. Reactivities of RH1 (2,5-diaziridinyl-3-[hydroxymethyl]-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone), a clinically studied antitumor cross-linking agent, and an analogue containing a phenyl group (2,5-diaziridinyl-3-[hydroxymethyl]-6-phenyl-1,4-benzoquinone, PhRH1) rather than a methyl group were compared. The bulky phenyl substituent was added to determine the impact of steric hindrance on the formation of cross-links within a double helical structure. Cross-links formed by RH1 and PhRH1 were observed at 5'-dGNC sites as well as 5'-dGAAC/dGTTC sites. RH1 was more effective at forming cross-links than PhRH1 for a variety of duplexes. Infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD) and collision-induced dissociation results confirmed the presence and the location of the cross-links within the duplexes, and IRMPD was used to identify the dissociation pathways of the cross-linked duplexes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAziridinesBenzoquinonesChromatography, LiquidCross-Linking ReagentsDNATandem Mass Spectrometry2,5-diaziridinyl-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinoneAntineoplastic AgentsAziridinesBenzoquinonesCross-Linking ReagentsDNA

Identifiers

PMID20369834
PMCPMC2891125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.