Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20368798›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2010

Effective and steady differentiation of a clonal derivative of P19CL6 embryonal carcinoma cell line into beating cardiomyocytes.

Itsuki Mueller, Ryosuke Kobayashi, Takayuki Nakajima, Maki Ishii, Kazushige Ogawa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. p53 Suppression partially rescues the mutant phenotype in mouse models of DiGeorge syndrome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Itsuki MuellerDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, 1-58 Rinku-Ohraikita, Izumisano, Osaka 598-8531, Japan.
Ryosuke Kobayashi
Takayuki Nakajima
Maki Ishii
Kazushige Ogawa
Osaka Prefecture University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The P19CL6 cell line is a useful model to study cardiac differentiation in vitro. However, large variations were noticed in the differentiation rates among previous reports as well as our individual experiments. To overcome the unstable differentiation, we established P19CL6-A1, a new clonal derivative of P19CL6 that could differentiate into cardiomyocytes more efficiently and stably than the parent using the double stimulation with 5-Aza and DMSO based on the previous report. We also introduced a new software, Visorhythm, that can analyze the temporal variations in the beating rhythms and can chart correlograms displaying the oscillated rhythms. Using P19CL6-A1-derived cardiomyocytes and the software, we demonstrated that the correlograms could clearly display the enhancement of beating rates by cardiotonic reagents. These indicate that a combination of P19CL6-A1 and Visorhythm is a useful tool that can provide invaluable assistance in inotropic drug discovery, drug screening, and toxicity testing.

Indexed as

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthineAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, DrugGene Expression ProfilingMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastMyocytes, CardiacReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Messenger1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthineRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID20368798
PMCPMC2846686
OpenAlexW1979778744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.