Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20368650›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2010

Systematic review: surveillance for breast cancer in women treated with chest radiation for childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancer.

Tara O Henderson, Alison Amsterdam, Smita Bhatia, Melissa M Hudson, Anna T Meadows, Joseph P Neglia, Lisa R Diller, Louis S Constine, Robert A Smith, Martin C Mahoney and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Promoting Breast Cancer Surveillance: The EMPOWER Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic sensitivity of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for ductal carcinomaChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  11. Advances in Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tara O HendersonUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Alison Amsterdam
Smita Bhatia
Melissa M Hudson
Anna T Meadows
Joseph P Neglia
Lisa R Diller
Louis S Constine
Robert A Smith
Martin C Mahoney
Elizabeth A Morris
Leslie L Montgomery
Wendy Landier
Stephanie M Smith
Leslie L Robison
Kevin C Oeffinger
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USPalmetto Hematology Oncology · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
EMPOWER Study: Promoting BC Screening in Women Who Survived Childhood Cancer Administrative SupplementR01CA134722 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI FORD, JENNIFER S, OEFFINGER, KEVIN CHARLES · 2009 to 2022
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134722NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen treated with therapeutic chest radiation may develop breast cancer. PURPOSE: To summarize breast cancer risk and breast cancer surveillance in women after chest radiation for pediatric or young adult cancer. DATA SOURCES: Studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL (1966 to December 2008). STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected to answer any of 3 questions: What is the incidence and excess risk for breast cancer in women after chest radiation for pediatric or young adult cancer? For these women, are the clinical characteristics of breast cancer and the outcomes after therapy different from those of women with sporadic breast cancer in the general population? What are the potential benefits and harms associated with breast cancer surveillance among women exposed to chest radiation? DATA EXTRACTION: Three investigators independently extracted data and assessed study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Standardized incidence ratios ranged from 13.3 to 55.5; cumulative incidence of breast cancer by age 40 to 45 years ranged from 13% to 20%. Risk for breast cancer increased linearly with chest radiation dose. Available limited evidence suggests that the characteristics of breast cancer in these women and the outcomes after diagnosis are similar to those of women in the general population; mammography can detect breast cancer, although sensitivity is limited. LIMITATION: The quality of evidence for key questions 2 and 3 is limited by substantial study heterogeneity, variation in study design, and small sample size.

conclusionWomen treated with chest radiation have a substantially elevated risk for breast cancer at a young age, which does not seem to plateau. In this high-risk population, there seems to be a benefit associated with early detection. Further research is required to better define the harms and benefits of lifelong surveillance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsChildFemaleHodgkin DiseaseHumansIncidenceNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOdds RatioRadiotherapy DosageRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20368650
PMCPMC2857928
OpenAlexW2144209063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.