Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20368546›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2010

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases.

Charles M Balch, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Seng-Jaw Soong, John F Thompson, Shouluan Ding, David R Byrd, Natale Cascinelli, Alistair J Cochran, Daniel G Coit, Alexander M Eggermont and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03817125 (A Multicenter Phase 1b Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Blinded Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Microbiome Study Intervention Administration in Combination With Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Adult Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03817125 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Phase 1b Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Blinded Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Microbiome Study Intervention Administration in Combination With Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Adult Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorParker Institute for Cancer ImmunotherapyRan2019 to 2022Enrolled14ConditionsMetastatic MelanomaArmsPlacebo for antibiotic, Vancomycin pretreatment, Nivolumab, Matching Placebo for SER-401, SER-401
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. SEOM clinical guideline for the management of cutaneous melanoma (2020).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Gene variants in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis and cutaneous melanoma progression.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Charles M BalchDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N Wolfe St, Osler 624, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. balchch@jhmi.edu
Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Seng-Jaw Soong
John F Thompson
Shouluan Ding
David R Byrd
Natale Cascinelli
Alistair J Cochran
Daniel G Coit
Alexander M Eggermont
Timothy Johnson
John M Kirkwood
Stanley P Leong
Kelly M McMasters
Martin C Mihm
Donald L Morton
Merrick I Ross
Vernon K Sondak

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in MelanomaP50CA093459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GRIMM, ELIZABETH A · 2004 to 2014
$23.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCI NIH HHS P50 CA093459NCI NIH HHS P50 CA93459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the survival rates and independent predictors of survival using a contemporary international cohort of patients with stage III melanoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsComplete clinicopathologic and follow-up data were available for 2,313 patients with stage III disease in an updated and expanded American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging database. Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate survival analyses were performed.

resultsAmong all 2,313 patients with stage III disease, 81% had micrometastases, and 19% had clinically detectable macrometastases. The 5-year overall survival was 63%; it was 67% for patients with nodal micrometastases, and it was 43% for those with nodal macrometastases (P < .001). Tremendous heterogeneity in survival was observed, particularly in the microscopically detected nodal metastasis subset (from 23% to 87% for 5-year survival). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that in patients with nodal micrometastases, number of tumor-containing lymph nodes, primary tumor thickness, patient age, ulceration, and anatomic site of the primary independently predicted survival (all P < .01). When added to the model, primary tumor mitotic rate was the second-most powerful predictor of survival after the number of tumor-containing nodes. In contrast, for patients with nodal macrometastases, the number of tumor-containing nodes, primary ulceration, and patient age independently predicted survival (P < .01).

conclusionIn this multi-institutional analysis, we demonstrated remarkable heterogeneity of prognosis among patients with stage III melanoma, especially among those with nodal micrometastases. These results should be incorporated into the design and interpretation of future clinical trials involving patients with stage III melanoma.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaChi-Square DistributionEuropeFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID20368546
PMCPMC2982783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.