ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010
It is not the entropy you produce, rather, how you produce it.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Selection as a Process That Increases Metabolic Entropy Production? A Regime-Dependent Analysis in Open Chemostat Systems with Michaelis-Menten Kinetics and Mutation-Selection Dynamics.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond the Second Law: Darwinian Evolution as a Tendency for Entropy Production to Increase.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Self-Organization of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions Studied by the Maximum Entropy Production Principle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Natural Selection and Scale Invariance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Thermodynamics in Ecology-An Introductory Review.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Maximum Entropy Production Theorem for Transitions between Enzyme Functional States and Its Applications.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Splendor and misery of adaptation, or the importance of neutral null for understanding evolution.BMC biology · 2016Article
- Life is a self-organizing machine driven by the informational cycle of Brillouin.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2013Article
- Maximum entropy production in environmental and ecological systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The principle of maximum entropy production (MEP) seeks to better understand a large variety of the Earth's environmental and ecological systems by postulating that processes far from thermodynamic equilibrium will 'adapt to steady states at which they dissipate energy and produce entropy at the maximum possible rate'. Our aim in this 'outside view', invited by Axel Kleidon, is to focus on what we think is an outstanding challenge for MEP and for irreversible thermodynamics in general: making specific predictions about the relative contribution of individual processes to entropy production. Using studies that compared entropy production in the atmosphere of a dry versus humid Earth, we show that two systems might have the same entropy production rate but very different internal dynamics of dissipation. Using the results of several of the papers in this special issue and a thought experiment, we show that components of life-containing systems can evolve to either lower or raise the entropy production rate. Our analysis makes explicit fundamental questions for MEP that should be brought into focus: can MEP predict not just the overall state of entropy production of a system but also the details of the sub-systems of dissipaters within the system? Which fluxes of the system are those that are most likely to be maximized? How it is possible for MEP theory to be so domain-neutral that it can claim to apply equally to both purely physical-chemical systems and also systems governed by the 'laws' of biological evolution? We conclude that the principle of MEP needs to take on the issue of exactly how entropy is produced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.