SynthesisJournal of neurotrauma2011
Assessment of disability in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Journal of neurotrauma, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of aquatic therapy in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spinal cord · 2023Pooled it
- Walking Ability Outcome Measures in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Effectiveness of intense, activity-based physical therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury in promoting motor and sensory recovery: is olfactory mucosa autograft a factor?The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2013Trial
- Three-Grade Neurological Recovery (ASIA Impairment Scale A to D) Following Surgical Stabilization of Traumatic D11-D12 Meyerding Grade IV Spondylolisthesis: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Effect of rehabilitation timing on the functional, vocational, and psychological outcomes in patients with paraplegia secondary to traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Translation and validation of the Chinese self-report version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch psychometric analysis and online application.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Rehabilitation to Improve Outcomes after Cervical Spine Surgery: Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) Self-Report.Spinal cord · 2021Article
- Effects on Outcomes of Hyperglycemia in the Hyperacute Stage after Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Neurotrauma reports · 2021Article
- Is admission to an SCI specialized rehabilitation facility associated with better functional outcomes? Analysis of data from the Thai Spinal Cord Injury Registry.Spinal cord · 2019Article
- Lack of knowledge and training are the major obstacles in application of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) in China.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2019Article
- Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: Prognostic Insights and Future Potentials.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Functional status predicts acute care readmission in the traumatic spinal cord injury population.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2019Article
- The Overlooked Outcome Measure for Spinal Cord Injury: Use of Assistive Devices.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in Children With Tetraplegia.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2018Article
- Relevance of the international spinal cord injury basic data sets to youth: an Inter-Professional review with recommendations.Spinal cord · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the importance of accurately and reliably assessing disability in future clinical trials, which will test therapeutic strategies in acute spinal cord injury (SCI), we sought to appraise comprehensively studies that focused on the psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of all previously used outcome measures in the SCI population. The search strategy included Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Two reviewers independently assessed each study regarding eligibility, level of evidence (using Sackett's criteria), and quality. Of 363 abstracts captured in our search, 36 full articles fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight different outcome measures were used to assess disability in the SCI population, including Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Spinal cord Injury Measure (SCIM), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI), Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Timed Up & Go (TUG), 6-min walk test (6MWT), and 10-m walk test (10MWT). While 19 of 36 studies provided level-4 evidence, the remaining 17 articles were classified as level-2b evidence. Most of the instruments showed convergent construct validity in the SCI population, but criterion validity was not examined due to the lack a gold standard for assessment of disability. All instruments were tested in the rehabilitation and/or community setting, but only FIM was examined in the acute care setting. Based on our results of quality assessment, the SCIM has the most appropriate performance regarding the instrument's psychometric properties. Nonetheless, further investigations are required to confirm the adequate performance of the SCIM as a comprehensive measure of functional recovery in patients with SCI in rehabilitative care. The expert panel of the Spinal Cord Injury Solutions Network (SCISN) that participated in the modified Delphi process endorsed these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.