Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20365769›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics2010

Phenomenological approach to eukaryotic chemotactic efficiency.

Bo Hu, Danny Fuller, William F Loomis, Herbert Levine, Wouter-Jan Rappel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How input fluctuations reshape the dynamics of a biological switching system.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Noise effects in nonlinear biochemical signaling.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How geometry and internal bias affect the accuracy of eukaryotic gradient sensing.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bo HuDepartment of Physics and Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0374, USA.
Danny Fuller
William F Loomis
Herbert Levine
Wouter-Jan Rappel

Funding

Project 5P01GM078586 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RAPPEL, WOUTER-JAN · 2007 to 2016
$11.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM078586NIGMS NIH HHS P01GM078586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells are capable of detecting small chemical gradients for a wide range of background concentrations. Ultimately, fluctuations place a limit on gradient sensing and recent work has focused on the role of stochastic receptor occupancy as one possible limiting factor. Here, we use a phenomenological approach to add spontaneous motility fluctuations to receptor noise and predict the directional statistics of eukaryotic chemotaxis. Specifically, an Itô diffusion equation with direction-dependent multiplicative noise is developed and analytically studied. We show that our approach can naturally accommodate recent experimental data for the chemotaxis of the social amoeba Dictyostelium.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalChemotaxisComputer SimulationDictyosteliumEukaryotic Cells

Identifiers

PMID20365769
PMCPMC2872938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.