Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20364882›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2010

Suppression of third ventricular NPY-elicited feeding following medullary reticular formation infusions of muscimol.

Joseph B Travers, Kenneth Herman, Susan P Travers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A genetically defined pontine nucleus essential for ingestion in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Central Mechanisms of Thermoregulation and Fever in Mammals.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Activation of NPY receptors suppresses excitatory synaptic transmission in a taste-feeding network in the lower brain stem.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph B TraversDivision of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Travers.1@osu.edu
Kenneth Herman
Susan P Travers
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

GUSTATORY AFFERENT ORGANIZATION IN THE SOLITARY NUCLEUSR01DC000416 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TRAVERS, SUSAN P · 1992 to 2013
$2.7M
NEURAL BASIS OF TASTE ELICITED INGESTION AND REJECTIONR01DC000417 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TRAVERS, JOSEPH B · 1989 to 2009
$2.2M
ACOUSTIC PROCESSING IN THE HUMAN FRONTAL LOBEF32DC000417 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BAKKEN, HANS E · 1999 to 2001
$19k
OLFACTORY BULB CIRCUIT ANALYSISF33DC000416 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEREDITH, MICHAEL · 1999 to 2000
$4k
GUSTATORY AFFERENT ORGANIZATION IN THE SOLITARY NUCLEUSR29DC000416 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TRAVERS, SUSAN P · 1988 to 1990
–
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-00416NIDCD NIH HHS DC-00417NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000417NIDCD NIH HHS F33 DC000416NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000416NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appetitive component of feeding is controlled by forebrain substrates, but the consummatory behaviors of licking, mastication, and swallowing are organized in the brainstem. The target of forebrain appetitive signals is unclear but likely includes regions of the medullary reticular formation (RF). This study was undertaken to determine the necessity of different RF regions for mastication induced by a descending appetitive signal. We measured solid food intake in response to third ventricular (3V) infusions of the orexigenic peptide neuropeptide Y 3-36 in awake, freely moving rats and determined whether focal RF infusions of the GABAA agonist muscimol suppressed eating. RF infusions were centered in either the lateral tegmental field, comprising the intermediate (IRt) and parvocellular (PCRt) RF, or in the nucleus gigantocellularis (Gi). Infusions of NPY 3-36 (5 microg/5 microl) into 3V significantly increased feeding of solid food over a 90-min period compared with the noninfused condition (4.3 g +/- 0.56 vs. 0.57 g +/- 0.57, p < .001). NPY 3-36-induced food intake was suppressed (1.7 g +/- 0.48) by simultaneous infusions of muscimol (0.6 mM/100 nl) into the IRt/PCRt (p < .01). Coincident with the decrease in feeding was a decrease in the amplitude of anterior digastric muscle contractions in response to intraoral sucrose infusions. In contrast, infusions of muscimol into Gi had no discernible effect on food intake or EMG amplitude. These data suggest that the IRt/PCRt is essential for forebrain-initiated mastication, but that the Gi is not a necessary link in this pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsAppetite StimulantsDrug InteractionsEatingGABA AgonistsInjections, IntraventricularMasticationMedulla OblongataMuscimolNeuropeptide YPeptide FragmentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReticular FormationStomachSucroseAppetite StimulantsGABA AgonistsMuscimolNeuropeptide Yneuropeptide Y (3-36)Peptide FragmentsSucrose

Identifiers

PMID20364882
PMCPMC2853031
OpenAlexW2054454955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.