ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
Protective vascular treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease: guideline adherence according to year, age and gender.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Female patients at increased risk for adverse outcomes after acute limb ischemia.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Clinician underprescription of and patient nonadherence to clinical practice guideline-recommended medications for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Vascular Diseases in Women: Do Women Suffer from Them Differently?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Pink Tax: Sex and Gender Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease.US cardiology · 2024Review
- Sex as a Key Determinant of Peripheral Artery Disease: Epidemiology, Differential Outcomes, and Proposed Biological Mechanisms.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2022Review
- Sex-Specific Differences in Cardiovascular Risk, Risk Factors and Risk Management in the Peripheral Arterial Disease Population.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Women Specific Characteristics and 1-Year Outcome Among Patients Hospitalized for Peripheral Artery Disease: A Monocentric Cohort Analysis in a Tertiary Center.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Gender Differences in the Medical Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Peripheral Vascular Disease in Women: Therapeutic Options in 2019.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Peripheral Arterial Disease in Women: an Overview of Risk Factor Profile, Clinical Features, and Outcomes.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018Review
- Vascular quality of care pilot study: how admission to a vascular surgery service affects evidence-based pharmacologic risk factor modification in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.Vascular health and risk management · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate vasoprotective pharmacological treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) according to: 1) year, 2) age and 3) gender.
methodsAn observational retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the systemic vascular treatment of a population-based cohort of patients with PAD > or = 50 years old, discharged from a tertiary-care teaching hospital between January 1, 1997 and December 11, 2006. Data were obtained from the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec. Drugs evaluated included antiplatelet agents (APs), statins (STs) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and a combination of all three. Proportions of patients treated were compared according to year, age and gender using Chi-square.
resultsThe mean age of the study population (5962 individuals) was 73.2 +/- 9.1 years; 43.8% were women. After hospital discharge, 71.6%, 47.6%, 42.2% and 20.6% were taking respectively, an AP, statin, ACEI or all three. Protective treatment improved significantly from 1997 to 2006. Significantly more subjects 50-64 years used a statin or all three agents, compared to subjects > or = 65 years (statins: 56.6% vs. 45.8%, all three: 26.2% vs. 19.5%; p < 0.001). Significantly more men than women used statins (49.1% vs. 45.6%; p < 0.001) and ACEIs (44.5% vs. 39.3%; p < 0.001). Similarily, use of all three agents was 22.4% for men and 18.2% for women (p < 0.001).
conclusionsAlthough systemic vascular treatment received by patients with PAD has increased in the past years, it remains suboptimal, particularly for older patients and women. Strategies to improve adherence to treatment guidelines should be developed for these high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20364548PMC6973983W2106445626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.