Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20364548›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique

Protective vascular treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease: guideline adherence according to year, age and gender.

Mariane Pâquet, Danielle Pilon, Jean-Pierre Tétrault, Nathalie Carrier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Peripheral Vascular Disease in Women: Therapeutic Options in 2019.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariane PâquetCentre de recherche sur le vieillissement, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC. mariane.paquet@usherbrooke.ca
Danielle Pilon
Jean-Pierre Tétrault
Nathalie Carrier
Health and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate vasoprotective pharmacological treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) according to: 1) year, 2) age and 3) gender.

methodsAn observational retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the systemic vascular treatment of a population-based cohort of patients with PAD > or = 50 years old, discharged from a tertiary-care teaching hospital between January 1, 1997 and December 11, 2006. Data were obtained from the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec. Drugs evaluated included antiplatelet agents (APs), statins (STs) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and a combination of all three. Proportions of patients treated were compared according to year, age and gender using Chi-square.

resultsThe mean age of the study population (5962 individuals) was 73.2 +/- 9.1 years; 43.8% were women. After hospital discharge, 71.6%, 47.6%, 42.2% and 20.6% were taking respectively, an AP, statin, ACEI or all three. Protective treatment improved significantly from 1997 to 2006. Significantly more subjects 50-64 years used a statin or all three agents, compared to subjects > or = 65 years (statins: 56.6% vs. 45.8%, all three: 26.2% vs. 19.5%; p < 0.001). Significantly more men than women used statins (49.1% vs. 45.6%; p < 0.001) and ACEIs (44.5% vs. 39.3%; p < 0.001). Similarily, use of all three agents was 22.4% for men and 18.2% for women (p < 0.001).

conclusionsAlthough systemic vascular treatment received by patients with PAD has increased in the past years, it remains suboptimal, particularly for older patients and women. Strategies to improve adherence to treatment guidelines should be developed for these high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Secondary PreventionAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBiomarkersFemaleGuideline AdherenceHospitals, TeachingHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseasePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsQuebecAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBiomarkersHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20364548
PMCPMC6973983
OpenAlexW2106445626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.