ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
[The practice and acceptance of physician preventive medicine services in a Montreal university hospital and the obstacles that deter their implementation.].
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored physical activity intervention for adults from Quebec City.BMC public health · 2015Trial
- A Clinical Preventive Strategy Based on a Digital Tool to Improve Access to Endocrine Disruptors Exposure Prevention: The MEDPREVED Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- [Computer tailoring: a potential solution for optimizing prevention counseling].Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publiqueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPresent a picture of physicians' preventive clinical practices (PCP) at a university medical centre, and identify the obstacles that hinder their implementation.
methodSelf-administered questionnaire survey addressed to 367 general practitioners and specialists working at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) in 2006.
resultsRespondents claim to be recommending PCP (often or very often) in approximately 60-82% of cases. Women physicians report a larger integration for screening and vaccination (p < 0.05). General physicians claim to apply or recommend PCP more frequently than specialists (p < 0.05), except for anti-tobacco counseling. Lack of time (82%) and deficiencies in continuity of treatment (75%) are considered by the majority of respondents as major obstacles to the realization of PCP. Most participants (99%) consider delivering preventive services to be part of their role and 98% claim to be motivated to integrate PCP into their practice. However, almost half of physicians do not apply preventive recommendations to their own life and at least two thirds of them doubt the efficacy of counseling.
conclusionDespite observed encouraging results, actions must be taken to improve the integration of PCP to general and specialized health care and to bring physicians around to adopting healthy lifestyle habits themselves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20364542PMC6973848What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.